پژوهش نامه فقه اجتماعی
پیاپی 9 (پاییز و زمستان 1395)

Nowadays, Caricature Considered as an accepted fields and one of the best ways of communication. This field of art contains several type of it, Including face or political caricature. The purpose of caricature often associated with the development of thinking in the audience. the birthplace of this art is the recent century in the West Unlike the claims of some dating back more than a thousand years ago. because of the caricature based on unlimited boundaries than the religious values, so we have to see the possibility of extending the caricature if it will be possible in Islamic society or not? The important question is that can we condemn it to be prohibited and unlawful or we should to separate between different types of it?
Some commands to prohibition of extending the caricature, cited on prohibition of drawing the living things or Harassment of believers, that each of this reasons is Limited or wider than the claim. The Desecration of sanctities principle which is accepted by Jurists could be a strong and important reason to probation of this free and unlimited art in Islamic society based on values. At first the research tries to study and analyst the reasons of the principle after that relying on findings, declare that the caricature is one of samples of the principle, or not

One of the issues discussed below by the jurisprudents discussed in the context of a corrupt bargain is the question of the provision of financial security when it lost or falls, with the assumption of survival, and the question is that when the total collapse of finance or its loss, Will the owner give rise to exclusion or will the taxable person be the same? According to the famous view of the jurists in the assumption of a lack of finance, the individual is not a guarantor of finance, but in the assumption of a complete collapse of finance, fame is not formed. According to the authors, in the assumption of the complete collapse of finance, the promise of a documentary warrant is more solid, and in the assumption of a lack of finance, the famous promise of the jurists is unacceptable, since the collective funds that have been made by the famous contradictory narratives of this bay are all shapes and must be between The lack of finance resulted from the complete loss of a trait and its lack of detail.

Saleable usury as a kind of usury is reciprocity with one side more or less, if can be weighed, this kind of usury is forbidden in Islam and the Islamic jurisprudents believe so. In this article, the purpose of the investigation and explanation of the ruling of the circumstance And the validity of such transactions in terms of its validity or invalidity is in the Islamic Jurisprudence and Iran’s law that There is a controversy between jurists and lawyers about the circumstance of these types of transactions, But according to the famous comment, it should be noted that a transaction rampant exists in all interconnected contracts, such as marriage contracts, peace, and other arbitrary contracts. And it is not for a marriage contract, and this is also recognized in Iran's law, in the wake of the famous Islamic Jurisprudence, in Article 595 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran (Tahitian Section), adopted in 1375. Also, in relation to the verdict or invalidity of a business deal there is a controversy between jurists and jurists. And the point of view in this regard is the lack of the principle of the transaction and the amount of extra that receive in it.

One of the important principles of Jurisprudence that Retrieved from in Theological issues is Non-Muslim's Obligation to Ancillaries that has been discussed by Imami Jurisprudence from a long time ago. Jurists believe that infidels bound to Ancillaries. In the present research, authors were realized with considering the reasons of two famous believes that the reasons of Jurists that dont believe that infidels bound to Ancillaries has been reinforced the theory of the absence of obligation, or, we can Establish a relationship between two opinions that there difference are not fundamental, because Non-Muslim's Obligation to Ancillaries is on the way of the three obligation to principles and believes and infidels will punish because lack of there faith.

Considering that in jurisprudential books, it is only stated that there are indications of the traditions concerning infidelity and there is not enough discussion about the concept, the term, the jurisprudential ruling and its arguments; this article has been written to complete the defect in this topic. For this purpose, the term "conjunction" is firstly has been meaning, then it has been said that the intention of the subject is a condition for the fulfillment of the title of infidelity. In order to reach the absolute jurisprudential ruling of infidels, due to the different sources of jurisprudence, the expression and analysis of the verses, narrations and the rule of negation of the mastery have been discussed, and stated if the followings and similarities of the infidels are only taken from their disbelief and their rituals are condemned to reverence, and if they are not part of their rites, they are not lawful, but they cannot be rebuked, but they should be disgusted. Accordingly, if the passage of time results in the exclusion of the infidels and the slogan of the infidels, then the sanction will be eliminated because the subject of the sentence has been ruled out.

According to jurists and jurists, death and bankruptcy are occurring. There are disagreements between jurists and jurists on the issue of divination. In the case of the jurisdiction of the court, some of the debts and obligations, whether contractual or non-contractual, are based on the principle of "incurring a lump sum" and are subject to this rule. In the relative solvency, compulsory deductions will be enforceable, while Absolute solvation, discounts and degradation are not made. Accordingly, there is no difference between civil law and commerce in terms of solvation, and, on both bases, absolute solvation is accepted. This difference stems from a different attitude toward the meaning of religion and commitment. The jurisprudence of the Imamiyah jurisprudence is that the possibility of violating the rights of the soul by the heirs and also based on the rule of law in this area cannot be invoked because firstly, the destruction of property and the walnut by the heir is a possible aspect and is not credible. And secondly, it is owed to the possibility of property damage, and before the death, because the property also owes public credit to creditors. Therefore, the mere possibility of the property being wiped out by the heirs cannot be ruled out in accordance with the rule of law and in defense of the ruling. Therefore, according to the rule of "Llagl Ibn-i-e-Thoman", the other party to the deceased as a contractor of the Ajllah has spent part of his salary in order to obtain an obligation from the obligated party, and therefore the non-survival of Ajl is condemned to be free. It is suggested that in the area of the resolution of the deceased and insolvent decision-making theory, according to which the inheritance of the law will not be eliminated unconditionally and not subject to the rule of unfairness, it is accepted. The basis accepted in jurisprudence and law of Iran can be cited.