نشریه بحوث فی اللغه العربیه
سال نهم شماره 1 (پیاپی 18، بهار و تابستان 1397)

Allameh Fadlallah studied at the Seminary of Najaf, and this area had a considerable impact on the formation of his character. From the very beginning of his childhood, he made a strong relation with Islamic thoughts. He grew up in a religious, literary, and erudite family, both in Lebanon or in Najaf. “Ghasaed Leleslam va Alhayat” is one of his best known poetical works. The aforementioned work paved a novel way toward Arabic poetry, in general, and Iraqi-Najafi poetry, in particular. His poetic dictionary is replete with various vocabularies. In his relation with God as well as in his prayers, Fadlallah uses various words and terms linking man to the world of infinity. By investigating “Ghasaed Leleslam va Alhayat” (Poetry), in the present study, attempts were made to examine the religious thoughts of the aforementioned poet and to determine the most significant semantic fields used in this work. The most prominent religious semantic fields used in this work are divided into two groups: semantic fields of religion principals and that of the religion minor principles. Both fields are also divided into further subfields. In each semantic field, the special terms of that field is used by the poet. In addition to pointing out these fields, this study deals with the way of using the aforementioned terms by the poet. In these fields, thematic codes leading to the awareness of people, particularly the lovers of AhlulBayt.

The style is a systematic practice of language tools, including interrogations which is considered one of the most important methods to influence on the emotion of the audience, and authors are keen to increase the use of interrogation in their poetry to be uniform. Interrogation is an independent and important part in the language and has many rhetorical purposes used in the poetry of resistance. The Palestinian poet Samy Al-Qāsim, who is the trinity poet reflects the style of interrogation in his poetry many times for showing Palestinian issue and Palestinian suffering. The court «Persona Non Grata» has the most important poetic effects on Samy Al-Qāsim which has been used by high style. This study aims, using descriptive-analytical method, to contribute to the detection of rhetorical purposes which lie in the style of interrogation. The results of this study showed that the style of interrogation is a more constructive method in this court, and it plays an important role in expressing opinions. Also, Sami used literal interrogation widely and more than interrogation in terms of repetition. Metaphorical sense in the court is more than the true meaning and most of rhetorical purposes used in the court are exile, prevention, and exclamation for Palestinian issue.

The definite article “al” is one of the controversial issues of Arabic language. A classical debate in regards to al- is whether the hamza is volatile or not. Some believe that the hamza is volatile. In this opinion, the hamza neither is part of al- nor contributes to the definiteness of the following word. On the other hand, some consider the hamza not to be volatile. Some do not consider the hamza volatile and assert that it contributes to the definiteness of the following word. Others assert that the hamza contributes to the definiteness of the following word but is still volatile. In this regard, the purpose of this article is to study, compare and analyze the differences between the grammarians and finally with the use of a descriptive-analytical approach to reach to the the most accurate view on the hamza of “al” and definiteness of the following word. One of the most important findings of this study is that the (laam) contributes to the definiteness of the following word and (al) is volatile. The reasons for preferring this opinion among the different opinions of grammarians is that this opinion is more powerful and its evidence is mastered and its reliance is on some fundamental syntactic evidences.

One of the common styles in ancient and contemporary Arabic is the expression of «ãÇ… ãöä». This style has been used 105 times in Tuḥaf al-'Uqūl and 21 times in Futūḥ al-Buldān. It consists of "ãÇ ÇáãæÕæáÉ" as a relative pronoun or "ãÇ ÇáÔÑØیÉ" as a conditional noun and "ãöä ÇáÈیÇäیÉ" as an indicative preposition. This style is studied in this article from the three grammatical, rhetorical and translational aspects. At first, different types of "ãÇ " have been briefly explained, then the meaning of "ãöä ÇáÈیÇäیÉ" and its translation has been expressed with many examples and the difference between that and "ãöä ÇáÊÈÚیÖیÉ" " as a partitive preposition has been elaborated. In the next section, the reason why this style is used and its rhetoric aspect are explained, then the translations of some examples of this style used in the above mentioned books, have been analyzed. The article concludes that this style is used for two stabilizing the author's thought and sometimes it can be used for indicating the generality of the subject. It also proves that there is not a specific method for translating this style; however, it should be done in a way that the fluency of the text is not harmed.

Arabic grammar for understanding the meaning of the Holy Quran emerged from the various methods and then was promoted step by step until the current advanced level, thanks to the different ways that researchers of Arabic language use for understanding the meaning of these methods. Fazel Saleh Allsameraei is a contemporary grammar gourmet that uses a different approach for the investigation of this science and attempts to return the meaning as spirit for inanimate body of logical arguments of grammar experts. This research, with its descriptive - analytical method, studies the books of this author, especially the meaning of syntax, investigation the methods that Fazel Saleh Allsameraei tried to revive the rough and soulless science. The Sameraei’s effort is based on restoring the grammar to the first two hegira centuries and investigating it along with eloquence sciences, especially semantics and addressing the audiences to primary sources of grammar noted as the most important of this research’s findings.

Scientific research journals are known as mostly used scientific sources and documents and are considered vastly by writers and researchers. Having this assumption in mind, surveying them and their content analysis are of great importance. For this reason, the present study deals with the analysis of the articles of the Biannual Journal of Research in Arabic Language and Literature (Bohouth Fi al-Loagha –al Arabiyya). This periodical is one of the important and valid journals of Arabic literature in Iran. One hundred articles of 191 researchers possessing Postgraduate degrees from 36 universities and institutes have been published during 15 issues so far. This paper aims to survey statistically and analytically the number of authors, their certificates, amount of cooperation among writers, active centers and institutes involving in journal’s process and so on. The followings are the outcomes of the study: 22 articles are written individually whereas 78 of them are written by authors and co-authors and of them 54 writers belong to the same universities and 23 to the various universities. One third of the articles contain contextualization and stylistics issues. Twenty two articles are written by the cooperation of editorial board members which indicates 22/22% mean which is one fifth of all. Totally, 2407 sources have been used as bibliography of the articles and the mean for each paper is 24/31 cited works which is an acceptable amount. Also, 1863 cited works (77/39%) possess more than 14 years life time.