فصلنامه رهیافت انقلاب اسلامی
پیاپی 30 (بهار 1394)

One of the most important responsibilities of political leaders is decision-making; decisions that specify the fate and course of political order and maybe can change its essence. With interpretative survey of books and political behavior of Imam Khomeini، it seems that the Theory of Sublimation-driven Rationality in the basis of indicators of protection of religious principles and values، realism، use of collective wisdom and heed of goodwill can present better understanding of the nature of logic of decision-making of Imam Khomeini. Moreover، the type of macro management that Ayatollah Khamenei has as the supreme leader of political order in the basis of Constitution and the related authorities at managing the Nuclear Subject indicates that ideas and results of his general politics is not in the basis of individual profit and loss، but the macro review and non-tactically looking at the Nuclear Subject and at the same time efforts to trust-making by many methods such as international laws and presenting of the Islamic order that reaching to the nuclear bombs is illegal (haram)، is accorded with the theory of Sublimation-driven Rationality Management.

This paper seeks the effect of aplication methods of legitimize to the actions and revolutionary action through the language studied. In the other words، Assuming the language capabilities of Production legitimacy to acts and practices، the question is that Islamic Revolution political actors in 1357، Which way spoken did uses to the Production legitimacy. Obviously، Discourse analysis of The text-based approach،is The best appropriate method for this study. However، discourse analysis can be used as the basis for theoretical research. For this purpose، this manuscript wrote By Roth Wodak Discourse- Historical method and Theo Van Leeuwen theory of Discourse analysis Legitimation. The Texts that have been produced by the actors of the Islamic Revolution can be divided in various genres. This article will focus on three genres: Disclosure، Call for rebellion and make Utopia. Also during this study Is considered texture In the text، Between the text، Status and historical of each of the genres and As well as Strategies and practices language legitimizing In each of them. Study of the discourse of Islamic Revolution in terms of its legitimacy texture، confirmed to the diversity and Multiplicity Methodical in the production of Verbal legitimacy by political actors in peresent Political field.

Forum moderation in the rise of Iran represents turbulence in the social infrastructure and the new demands in the field of cultural. That is why the analysis of the identity of this discourse reflects the new realities in the cultural world of Iran''s current. In this regard، the authors of this paper to investigate the identity of this discourse as a symbolic system and cultural environment of the world and have to study this question: How was the discourse of moderation in Iran''s cultural identity? To answer the question of cultural and dialectical discourse variables have been studied and analyzed the following hypothesis is: Identity moderate discourse، from the dialectical discourse in the community and in this regard، a synthesis of modern discourse of reform is conservative elements of traditional discourse.

Most of the theories of revolution are result of worlds famous revolutions experimental analysis and adjustment، and by their own experiences generalization، meanwhile claim to universality trying to study and investigate all revolutions. While conflicts among these theories are not covert to this field scholars and Continually create this question that: are these conflicts are as a result of theories incorrectness and represent incompetence of them? or، how that is possible to adjust theories conflicts by referring in common feature? Present research claims that despite of existing conflict among theories، all of the revolutions theories accepts internal evolution and shift and its role in revolutions but instead of emphasising to these fundamental factors، they introduse it as main factor of revolution. In present research internal evolution and shift studied as common feature of revolution theories and efforts have been made by referring it to martyr Sadrs theory which also confirmed to signs of Quran، to solve conflicts among revolution theories and by emphasising to internal evolution and shift as main factor of revolution creater، introduse comprehensive and universal theory which is documentry on inspiration and has higher capability.

Centralization administers the concentration، accumulation and monopoly of political force that accompanies with geographical centralization. Political underdevelopment has also been summarised in the loss of qualitative increment of political capacity of society and unavailability to contribution implements، multiplicity and democratic institutions. After establishment of conditional period، as generating a type of multiplicity، civil presence، contribution and operating the statehood-province hood communities، a type of uncentralized political system was established by Qajar، that the attendance and participation of proxies of strata and states in political and formal structure was a symbol of it. When the Pahlavi majesty was established، the policies based on government’s centralized political system were taken، and in order to forming a single nation and a unity government، the country was centralized. By appearance the second Pahlavi that followed the policy of first Pahlavi، the residual of political development’s symbols was completely removed. This paper has described the relation between two centralization variables similar to independent variable and political underdevelopment of society as a dependent variable، using a descriptive-analytical method and library references. The main question is: does centralization affect the political derdevelopment of contemporaneous Iran? The paper’s hypothesis states that there is a significant relationship between two variables: centralization and political development، and the centralization plays a key role in political underdevelopment of contemporaneous Iran. Given to paper’s results، political-formal centralization is directly proportional to political underdevelopment، and the political underdevelopment of contemporaneous Iran relates to politicalـformal intensive system.

Political education as a transfer process of knowledge، values and attitudes of the political system to the new generation and Brought some stability and durability the system، is The most important aspect of education and most essential issue that has long been of interest to philosophers and thinkers. Due to the impact of the political education from the ideological and philosophical foundations of society، this paper attempts to Study and research by the use the descriptive and analytical methods and Comparative Analysis، philosophical foundations of this education from the perspective of John Locke as a pioneer and founder of liberalism and imam Khomeini as a founder and theorist of modern political government، Which is based on political philosophy of Islam. Based on this research، there are some similarities and overlap in the concepts related to politics and political education among this two thinker، but In view of the philosophical bases، the differentiation frequency was observed. One from the most basic fundamental differences is the centrality of Towhid in all aspects of politics and political and educational activities of the Imam and the lack of this theoretical foundation in Locke’s thought.

Tolerance in the sense of taking things easy is a concept derived from the teachings of Islam، which can be used as a model for the world''s political systems. It can، also، develop a model of ethical behavior in relations between individuals. Nowadays، internal tensions in political systems and the increase of war and unrest among states have had unwelcoming effects on the countries'' social life. So the application of tolerance approach in both domestic and foreign political system can reduce stress domestically and increase cooperation internationally. Using system theory and taking a descriptive and analytical approach، this paper aims to explore the impacts of tolerance policy on domestic and foreign political system of the Islamic Republic of Iran.