فصلنامه مطالعات روابط بین الملل
پیاپی 37 (بهار 1396)

The historical study of the development economics in Mexico and an overview of the changes and changes in the patterns of economic development in the country due to the role and position of Mexico in the world today, and especially its important position in the global economy, which has been promoted to the eleventh largest economy in the world, is very important. . Particularly controversial issues raised by Donald Trump, the newly elected President of the United States in connection with Mexico, once again put the country at the forefront. Regarding Mexican economic jumps in recent years, the paper seeks to underline the development economics in Mexico in the historical context, with emphasis on developments over the past few decades in terms of the changes and effects of the global economic system, in particular the neoliberal economic approach to this country. It has been surveyed and attempts to make the Mexican economic success a little clearer in recent years. Thus, the main research concern in this paper is the contemplation of the process of transformation in the patterns of development economics in Mexico with the aim of examining the various effects and consequences of the neoliberal developmental pattern of the country's economic development in recent decades.

Due to the assigned right according to the constitutional law by Kemal Ataturk for the protection of the republic of Turkey and Kemalism values, the Turkey army in the years of 1960, 1971, 1980, and 1997 have attempted a coup. But with the empowerment of justice and development party in 2003 and comprehensive development of the country, Turkey was on an ongoing passing to democracy. In addition, the party of justice and development has closed the ways leading to the coup through legal strategies and modification of the enacted constitutional law during military coups. Though, the army attempted military coup against the party of justice and development for the fifth time in 26th July, 2016. Therefore, this question raises that in spite of the comprehensive development of Turkey after justice and development party coming to power and paving the way for a more liberal and democratic atmosphere and also limiting the role of army in politics, what factors have caused and set the stage for this military organization to attempt a coup? In response to this question this hypothesis took form that the reasons for such a coup could be depriving the army from value capabilities related to its power and depriving the movement of Fethullah Gulen from doing activities inside Turkey and ignorance of Kemalism values by the party of justice and development. The present study is based on analytical-descriptive method and also written and virtual sources were utilized for collecting the data.

In today's post-modern world, ethnic diaspora or displacement, whether forced or voluntary, is playing a key role in determining the policies of host countries or guests.Why the Diaspora in the fluidity of boundaries, creation or destruction of the nation – state phenomen have a tremendous role.Diaspora or Diaspora communities as a development agent or against the development shows variety of approaches in the sociology and psychology.And while this attitude with respect to the distance from home to the host community have geographical point.
Contemparary diaspora are , then seen to ocucpy a “ third spaces “ “ a position “ beyond space & time & beyond the situated practices of place & the lived experince of history ,thus diaspora is a way of creating a right between places of belonging & places of residence .
The research at the cross - sectional and geographical approaches and concepts with the help of space - the realm of the diaspora looks and explores the idea of “ rewritting of diaspora in relation to geography across the geography , place & space . ideed this preparetion for theoric base for ethnic and security policy for middle east region.

Multilateral agreements among countries in relation to the challenges usually open the door to the parties involved in the development of such agreements. Joint comprehensive plan of action is a tool for Iran to become effective players in international bargaining. In the period of era that was trying to isolated Iran Under the pretext of trying to acquire nuclear weapons. JCPOA was the result of over a decade of challenge and fruitless negotiations with Western parties. Iran has officially entered to the economic and political clubs of the global and regional environment after Joint comprehensive Plan of Action. This Thesis seeks to answer the question of Iran's engagement with the international community in the post- JCPOA what have impacted on the country's role in West Asia and the world? This Thesis examines the hypothesis with library and documentary method that Iran after the JCPOA was exited from Controlled previous position and become an active player in regional crisis management and this alters the balance of power in the region has been to the detriment of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

In recent decades many of rules, principles and procedures which dominates the interactions of international actors have changed dramatically due to a transition from Westphalian order to post Westphalian order in world system. In response to the changes of global arena, new diplomacy has emerged with different forms like media diplomacy, public diplomacy, track two diplomacy and virtual diplomacy. Understanding the reasons of the emergence of new diplomacy is very important and can be influential in determining foreign policy’s course of action.
This article tries to investigate the reasons of the emergence of new diplomacy in the changing world system and proposes three factors as a hypothesis: declining of the role of sovereign states as a consequence of the growth of non-governmental actors, remarkable advancements in information and communication technologies and the enhancement of public opinion status. The results of this article can offer guidelines for directing Iran’ foreign policy.

Iran and Israel can be explained in terms of a zero-sum game. This means that it has to c. A. Iran is intolerable and Israel on the other hand c. A. Iran's missile and nuclear program because of the enjoyment of power and considerable influence in the Muslim world, existential threat to its own. For this reason, in the regional and international levels against the interests of c. A. Iran has moved. In this way, it has the potential and capacities of the West, including America’s strategic interest were necessary. In this regard, pressure to stop the progress of Iran's nuclear program is the regime's security strategy.On the other hand, Iran, after long negotiations over its nuclear program controversial, it marked the historic deal with the P5 1 in Vienna. Nuclear deal, "Brjam", this promises that Iran's oil and financial sanctions in exchange for curbs on nuclear enrichment will be lost. The agreement also marks the strengthening of Iran as a regional hegemonic power comes up; it seemed that America had accepted it. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, a nuclear-armed Iran as the worst possible outcome in the current situation, he said. Similarly, the Persian Gulf Arab states felt that the agreement had been excluded. Tehran problematic area for those who know, this agreement means ignoring their demands to "cut off the head of the serpent" is. This paper examines the status of Iran's nuclear program in Israel's security doctrine.