نشریه پژوهش نامه حقوق بشری
پیاپی 4 (تابستان 1395)

The purpose of this paper is to explain the relationship between the right and obligation, in Islamic view and contemporary international law. The relationship between the right andobligation is one of the controversial issues among thinkers in the philosophy. The main question is that, what is the relationship between rights and obligation? The Islamic scholars and Western lawyers have given different answers to this question. In view of international community contrary to the Islam, the contemporary era is known as the transition period of Obligation. In the world of modernism should speake about right and no obligation. This article examines the concepts of the right and obligation and the relationship between the right and obligation in Islam and the contemporary international community, in the framework of the theory of «separation of the right and obligation» and “ concomitance of the right and obligation ” by descriptive and analytical method.

Rights of religious minorities is considered an integral part of human rights. Given the vulnerability of the Rights of religious minorities, respecting the rights of them originates domestic and international obligations. That today many governments have been challenged. Actually, this topic is one of the most important human rights issues in the international arena that the Islamic Republic of Iran is also closely is associated with it. Although, Iran is one of the few countries which declared its position relative to the protection of minorities explicitly. According to the constitution, the highest political-civil position has been placed on rights of minorities; but always is charged with violation of minority rights by some countries. Actually, Iran›s Baha›is rights abuses are frequently expressed. This research try to analyze the rights of minorities in international law, Islam and the laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Examining issues of violence and how to establish peace remind an important point that women play an important role in establishing sustainable peace in light of freedom from discrimination and violence. Unfortunately, the role of the militant minority is challenged by the ideas of Radical Feminists, lack of forces, lack of funds. The article ,with references to violence against women as a threat to sustainable peace, has tried in order to evaluate the actions of women in the establishment and maintenance of peace in the international community.

Since legacy is one of the demands of the inner man and nature , in line with his attention human societies and religion is Islam expression. discuss why discrimination between men and women , always the most challenging the legal issues. The point is undeniable that in all the relatives of divine religions and non - Islamic heritage , according to a leading cause of gender , male or female , was set. and only in religion is Islam suggests that the legal provisions on the basis of the social and economic interests of inheritance and responsibilitiesto the responsibility of men and women , with regard to their affinity with the deceased person , it has been . though in all cases of the human personality criterion is that the legislation , the rights of women are equally as . excellence only criterion women in Islam, the same time that according to earn the divine virtue . no gain and other. inheritance difference in the legal system , and criticism of Islam mixes them sworn enemies of which is located in connection with the many opinions regardless of the truth , that have been submitted . This paper attempts after expressing the concept of heritage and others to debate and discuss the inheritance among women and relatives of divine religions and philosophy inheritance difference between men and women in Islam to pay.

In recent decades, Violence against women had been one of the most important issues of human rights . Despite the fact that, deal with all forms of violence is so importance but domestic violence , as the best example of violence, because of widespread in the world and physical and psychological damage to women is considered by the States and the solutions have been applied in both domestic and international. However, domestic violence has always been one of the major challenges in the implementation of human rights. This leads to the question: What is the role of government intervention in domestic violence? Since the instances of domestic violence is different in various countries, so government intervention should be proportionate to the culture and interests of society; and should be recognized inthe framework of mutual respect in the international arena. Nowadays , the states especiallywestern states pursue national interests. Increasing the number of domestic violence against women is a reason for this claim. According to this, this research will analyze the role of government intervention in violence by descriptive- analytical method.