Tactics of America for Syria's political subversion

The events and political developments in the years after the collapse of the bipolar system show that a wider range of countries have been subjected to political subversion. In this process, patterns of America’s security action have been changed. Security considers as a structural necessity. Therefore,theme of political subversion in countries like Syria must be considered as a part of America’s security interests in the Arab Middle East geopolitical zone which it also has a special important for security of Europe and Israel. The events of spring and summer 2011 in the Arab Middle East show that America has used model of the confiscation of social evolutions. According to this approach, the pattern of America behavior in Egypt and Tunisia has been based on crisis control and thus change of rulers took place rather than structural change. American agents’ Approach also has been based on Model of preserving Agent- Structure in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. However, America, France, Germany and Britain security attitude is different in Syria, as though they intend to politically overthrow the Baath artystructure and Syria political radical system. To achieve this end, they use Tactics of deauthorization, delegitimization, identity-building and identity construction, mobilization of social groups and creating a sense of relative deprivation. Each of the tactics mentioned above can be seen as a part of America security policy in order to political subversion in Syria. This approach is analyzed in light of Michael Doyle’s neo-liberal approach and political thought of Immanuel Kant’s democratic government.