Comparative Interpretation; Unreliable and Unstable Metalanguage

“Comparative interpretation” as a new phenomenon requires intellectual evaluation، methodology and epistemology. Analytical evaluation of present beliefs indicates nothing but an unrefined understanding of «Comparison» element which connects them. Superficial understanding of «Comparison» and unfamiliarity with qualities of comparative study experiences in other epistemological realms، leads present beliefs to failed efforts، so as not to provide appropriate or no response to plenty of interpretational questions and they are even unable to identify the borders between this specific interpretation and other types of interpretation or comparative disinter-pretational studies. A part of such disabilities originates from considering «Comparison» as an instrument for interpretation. Comparative interpretation as an emerging megalanguage in area of quranic interpretational studies is an ambiguous megalanguage and still confront with a lots of problems. A part of such disabilities originates from considering «Comparison» as an instrument for interpretation.