Language and meaning as a reason for criticizing the rational – philosophical reasoning from the perspective of the Tafkik School

Objections to philosophy and philosophical methods by Muslems and non–Muslems have been made in different ways. Objection to theology are more than other parts philosophy. The opposition comes from those who have serious religious concerns. Their concerns are in live with protective religion and its teachings. These people that to purify religion and clear it from pure philosophical reasoning.They are again mixing religion resist to philosophical reasoning. In addition¸ they believe that philosophy and rational reasoning can not help people arrive at God An intellectual current¸ which was rater called the “Tafkik School“ believed in such as orientation. These religious shiete schools disagree to inning and using of logical and philosophical method in circle islamical and humanism sciences. This paper was an attempt to argue that the objections made by the “Tafkik School“ to philosophical reasoning method into religion are language and semantic consideration. They further argue that the referential between the words and their meanings for God is different that by human beings. Our interpretations words are different from their divine meanings.