Explanation relation of essence's attributes with necessary Being from the viewpoint Mollasadra

Regarding the attributes of essence which encompasses seven attributes i.e. knowledge, power, life, will, speech, hearing and seeing, there are three main viewpoints; Islamic philosophers prior to Mollasadra and Imamietheologists have chosen the identity between attributes and essence.A group of non-imamietheologists like Asha’are and Keramie believed attributes to be additional to the essence and other groups like Mo’tazele preferred the idea of essence to be the representative of attributes. Having refuted the viewpoint of non-imamietheologists, Mollasadra believed in the identity between attributes and identity between them and essence. Establishing the principles such as simplicity of essence, originality of existence, grading in existence and so forth in every corner of his works, he presented numerous reasons to back up his claim. In some reasons, with disproving the attributes to be additional to the essence, he proved his claim and in some others directly believed the attributes to be identical to essence. In line with the discussion, the issue of attributes of essence, additional attributes, negative attributes and action attributes were discussed and resulted that with Sadra analysis, additional and negative attributes are identical to the essence of necessary; and action attributes as referring to the power attributes became identical to the necessary. In the end, we sought the viewpoint of religious texts regarding the relation between prime attributes. It was concluded that religious teaching supports the identity between attributes and essence.