Analysis of Reactions and Counterarguments with Development Strategies after the Islamic Revolution

Different and sometimes contradictory development strategies in Iran after the Islamic Revolution has been designed and implemented numerous implications in the community. Any arguments against this strategy which some of the arguments are contrary, more influential and development strategies have been pushed to the margins. In this paper, based on the theory of Alberto Hirschman, the rhetoric of reaction: perversity futility jeopardy analysis techniques-documents, techniques and strategies of opposition arguments have been analyzed. Results show the futility of arguing over other arguments to marginalized structural adjustment strategy, jeopardy argument, the most powerful argument that eventually led to the isolation of civil society strategy.