A Comparative Study of Martyr Motahhari and Rousseau's view about Moral Education Curriculum

The current study aims at analyzing the comparative study of moral education curriculum (aims, content, teaching-learning and evaluating methods) from the viewpoint of Martyr Motahhari and Rousseau. The study has been done through the method of analytic-documentary. To collect the data, sources and contexts related to the topic of the study were qualitatively analyzed by taking notes from the sources. The findings show that in some ((educational purposes)) there were coordination between the two views and some disagreements. Martyr Motahhari believes that the Quran ((content)) is the best. However Rousseau believes that nature and experience are the best contents. There are similar cases in ((teaching-learning methods)); however sometimes, various inferences can be drawn from interpretation of a method. In evaluation, Martyr Motahhari`s educational view contains self-assessment methods, and the evaluation is based on action and in Rousseau`s curriculum observation is the method of evaluation.