Comparative Comparison of Saudi Wahhabism and political discourse of Imam Khomeini (RA) with international peace and security

One of the great problems of international security is the phenomenon of terrorism that has been in danger life of human beings and relations among nations. In the present era, the Islamic world also faces the issue of growing the flow of terrorism that originated from the teachings of Wahhabism and has caused the killing of human beings with name of Salafism that with attributing himself to Islam and the Quran, it put a serious threat to Islam and Islamic values, in the way that Shows Islam as the manifestation of violence and war, which has shaped the most severe historical destruction against Islam. Saudi Arabia by taking on the theoretical foundations and verbal concepts of Wahhabism is known as one of the most important units supporting terrorism and also as a disturbing of international order. Against the discourse of Wahhabism, there is the political discourse of Imam Khomeini that it has always been the intention of using genuine Islamic principles to stablish peace through identification and elimination of global insecurity elements. The main thing in this article is that each of the two political discourses of Imam Khomeini's political Islam and Wahhabism discourse, what contribution did they have in providing or undermining international security? The research hypothesis can be designed in such a way that due to the radical and takfirist nature of Wahhabism discourse and use of concepts such as elementary jihad in this discourse and unconditional support for terrorist groups as operational arms, Saudi wahabism has been one of the most important factors in creating insecurity in the Middle East and beyond. Against, that political Islam discourse of Imam Khomeini with the principles and peaceful assumptions in its text (Such as the fight against terrorism), has been as one of the most important elements in creating peace and providing international security.