Verification of liability in the harmful actions of the government and its employees in the light of general rules of liability

In examining the civil liability of the government against the losses caused by government employees to the citizens, we first have to wonder whether such damages are fundamentally causing liability. Or because it is believed that the state sovereignty is absolute and that the government is at the service position, recognizing the state or its components liable is incorrect? And should not the actions of the government and its staff be considered as a pillar of other harmful measures? The second question is who is responsible for these kinds of losses: is the government or the cause of the damage? In examining the first question, we are faced with two categories of reason: a category of general rules and other specific arguments, which are special for these kinds of losses; as there are some arguments, which at first glance can be seen as an evidence for the lack of responsibility of the state. Each of these three categories requires separate review. What follows in this article is limited to the first category. This paper that examines some of the main principles from the standpoint of credibility of the document, the domain of its implication, and its implication on the basis of the guarantee of liability and liability in the assumed losses is an emphasis on the principle of non-immunity of states and their peers against their actions, including the need to adhere to the rights of citizens and in particular the liability for damages. And an introduction to the guaranty of liability and civil liability of the government against employee actions that are considered as an independent question.