Legal Status of the Judiciary in Social Prevention

In accordance with Part Five of Article 156 of the Constitution, the task of preventing crime and reforming the perpetrators has been entrusted to the judiciary, but the legislator has not specified which types of preventive measures have been taken and generally delegated this task to the judiciary. The terms of the executive act are not known in our laws. Our society suffers from chronic illness and abuse, which results in increasing the number of cases in the judiciary year-by-year and even over the years in the judiciary. The existence of millions of cases and the formation of various crimes and violations of the system of legal and penal system and the weakness of executive agencies, and all those who are sympathetic to the system should seek to prevent this issue and help the judiciary in this regard. In this regard, it is necessary to prevent the occurrence of crime and to refine the modern structures and techniques of the world today with the approach of judicial hygiene, legal health and the reform of crime prevention. From the outset of the constitution, the constitutional experts have disagreed over the transfer of responsibility for preventing crime to the judiciary, and some have argued that the judiciary, without the cooperation of the executive branch, can not move significantly in preventing crime. do it. In this paper, it is attempted to investigate the crime of crime in accordance with the existing laws of social prevention and, while analyzing the views of the consensus and the opposite, we conclude that the judiciary plays a fundamental role in this type of prevention, or can Has a coordinating role.