Investigation of the history of the formation of new subdivisions in the early Shiite school of Fiqh; A case study about the relationship between "Noshooz" (disobedience) and Alimony in the discussion of marriage

One of the most important periods in the history of Shiite school of Islamic jurisprudence is the end of "narrative jurisprudence" and the beginning of "inferential jurisprudence", which has greatly influenced the whole of Shia Fiqh. With the inception of novel inferences, new subdivisions added to the Islamic jurisprudence, which brought innovative principles. Although the origin of some of these new frameworks can be analyzed historically, but an important part of the effects and consequences of this period has remained subtle to this day. One of the consequences of the lack of a thorough analysis of the conditions of this new era is the inability to discover the factors behind the emergence of these subdivisions and the absence of a comprehensive system for their analysis. Of the most important examples of this phenomenon is a situation in which a variable has been added to one of the issues in one of the eras of inferential jurisprudence. Instantaneously by entering the issue, it affects all of its subordinate issues. And with the passage of time, not only will it become one of the basis of the issue in question, but itself is one of the underlying principles for the inference of other subdivisions and even other issues.
In this paper, these developments have been examined through the analysis of the components and investigation of the evolution of a jurisprudential subdivision from formation to progression. And a picture of its consequences in Shia jurisprudence will be demonstrated. The survey is based on the discussion of "necessity of the woman's alimony on husband", which has been subject to complexity and interference through various developments in different stages which makes it a decent example for reviewing these new criteria. With this review, the role of the historical course of inferential jurisprudence and the attitude of the Prophet's companions in shaping this complexity and the main causes of ambiguities in such subdivisions will be illuminated.