I nvestigating of the guaranty of corpus and benefits of property in the usurpation of endowments

Usurped property is sometimes left and it is sometimes wasted. If the usurped property is left, the usurper must immediately return it to its owner. The usurpers also is guarantor of the benefits of the usurped property and he must compensate for damage it. But if the usurped property increases during usurpation, in this case, famous jurisprudents believe that the usurpers is not the guarantor of the payment of the surplus amount, while if the price increase is due to the emergence of a new feature and description in the usurped property, the jurisprudents believe that in addition to the extradition of the property to its owner, the usurper must also recover the additional amount. But in particular the rules of usurpation on the assumption of wasting usurped property if that is a replaceable thing, what is the guarantor’s responsibility is replacing it with property like a wasted thing and if that is a priced property, waster will be the guarantor of the price of that property. But in cases where usurped property is priced property and the price of that property has increased or decreased the jurisprudents have expressed different opinions
in the criterion of price determination.