The evolution of social formulation and political mobilization in the Islamic Revolution of Iran (1926-1979)

The Islamic Revolution of Iran and the widespread class coalition that led to the fall of the monarchy in Iran, is one of the important events of the last quarter of the twentieth century. The importance of a massive political mobilization in this revolution has caused the attention of social and political scientists to always be addressed. The present study, with the commitment to the network model of Joel Migdal, attempts to explain the political mobilization in the Iranian revolution. Instead of examining the relationship between government and society, this view focuses on the relationship between society and the state and focuses on the impact of the transformations of power networks on government construction. After the Constitutional Revolution, Iran entered the "Absolute State" in the Pahlavi era. The main feature of Pahlavi's divisive state was the accumulation of resources and the concentration of power tools, and this process created a major obstacle to the development of the community's abilities. Thus, the question of the present article is, what is the relationship between the policies of the Pahlavi regime (first and second) with regard to the network of political and political mobilization leading to the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran? The findings of this paper, using a theoretical model focused on empirical analysis and emphasizing the state-society reflection relationship, indicate that Pahlavi's government has adopted policies against the Iranian network of nations that underlie the transformation of social fabric from the networked society to mass society and then mobilize Different classes in the Islamic Revolution of Iran under Islamist ideology.