Evaluation and Critique of the Views of Allameh Tabatabai, Judge Abdul Jabbar, Judge Baqalani In different Approaches to the Issue of Imamate

The issue of Imamate has a long history in the history of Islamic thought as well as various approaches to this issue. Imamate means the leadership and leadership of the ummah, which brings with it a kind of group obedience. but the question is, what is the scope and following of this dimension, which has caused differences between different Islamic religions, and which dimension of the dimensions of human life in this world and the hereafter. The religions of the Imams, Mu'tazilites and Ash'arites, despite the similarity in some characteristics of the Imam, have fundamental differences in the issue of Imamate. This has caused a constant conflict of opinion between the scholars and thinkers of these three religions in this regard. Analysis and critique of theological opinions and views of these Islamic theologians will explain the path of the Imam's right and position. This research, by describing and analyzing the text and in a library manner, seeks to analyze the philosophy of existence and characteristics of the Imam from the perspective of three prominent Islamic thinkers: Allameh Tabatabai Shiite, Judge Abdul Jabbar Mutazli and Judge Baqalani Ash'ari. Allameh expresses the truth of Imamate from the type of creational guardianship and esoteric and spiritual guidance and intellectual obligation of God, Judge Abdul Jabbar considers it as an executive and intellectual issue and a social necessity in order to preserve Islamic unity. Baqalani has also introduced it as a jurisprudential and religious branch in order to manage the affairs of the Islamic society.