A reflection on the possibility and impossibility of committed art

The discussion of value and non-price art is one of the controversial issues in art studies with theoretical background. There are three points of view about art and value; some believe that art is fundamentally disadvantaged, while others consider the introduction of the concepts of value and art to be inappropriate in terms of art, and they honor every art, while others are the only ones who are committed to value. In this article, after defining and defining the basic concepts, we examined the historical background of the art of non-profit scholarship and it became clear that the idea of ​​non-communist art was the origin of the epistemic and unconscious fields that are not located in our intellectual-cultural ecosystem. Consequently, we have shown that we can not only deny the possibility of worthless art, but that it is not possible to articulate art without any value (in the sense of sociology). In the final section of the paper, we argued that the value of art about its inherent utility and utility was proved.