Application of the Right to choose in permissible Contracts

According to the principle of the necessity of the contracts, the possibility of termination is an exceptional and unconventional one. Article 456 of the Civil Code of option has been considered as one of the cases of the dissolution of the necessary contracts and has not been included in the law of the law. Therefore, the issue of the flow and absence of option in the authorized contract is not much investigated. The reason is that the well-known jurisprudents have rejected the option flow in an acceptable contract, which is contrary to the rules governing the contract. This group of jurisprudents has stated that: according to the rules governing the contract, the flow of option in this contract is contrary to the principle, since the permit for termination is permissible in the nature of the contract and does not require cucumber. But the promise against the jurisprudents is that the cucumbers in this contract are regarded as the proper contracts.The purpose of this article is to investigate the effects of bayatars in the works and their works, which can be analyzed by analytical-descriptive methods and by investigating jurisprudential sources and the views of jurists in the existing sources, which ultimately concludes that the use of bouquets In an acceptable contract, not only does not have a legal ban, but it can also have legal and legal effects, and this is the most important goal of the research.