Conflicting diaspora structures in countries of origin and destination

Immigrants and diaspora communities, as strategic agents, play an important role in the policies of developed and developing countries in economic and social policies. All economic and political schools have agreed on the dual positive or negative impact of immigration and diaspora on the economy and security of the country of origin and destination, and therefore the schools of political economy have had different and sometimes conflicting analyzes in this regard in recent years. Concepts such as diaspora or diaspora communities have also been considered by security policymakers throughout the concept of migration, who have analyzed migrants in terms of threat / opportunity. The hypothesis of this article is that the presence of foreign immigrants in countries has positive and negative consequences in the field of security and economy and Diaspora policy in this field can create many benefits in various fields, because the immigrant community as A development agent at the national / sub-national and sub-national levels, peace-builders for the host community in the host community, the promotion of a cheap and active workforce in the destination community and, of course, conflicts in the guest communities. From the strategic literature of many theories and policy agendas of the developed countries of the world, it can be stated that different policy-making movements regarding immigrants that are related to the growth of trade and economy of the country of origin / destination are one of the divisions, assimilation, segregation, convergence and It is marginalization and no other image is conceivable for immigrant countries. . However, the forthcoming research, using abundant library, field and monitoring resources of immigration policy of developed countries, deals with the advantages and disadvantages of diaspora communities in the country of origin and destination in a descriptive analytical manner. It deals with the function of this sociological field and its effects on the guest community. Finally, what is clear and prominent about the present study is that the migration of migrants of all kinds is Janus-like and contains elements of threat / opportunity for the economic / social spheres in the host communities.