Comparative Study of Tendering Procedures in "Iran's Tender Law" and "UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement 2014"

In order to enforce the objectives of procurement regulations,legislative bodies design procedures for conducting public sectors procurement so that public sector entities can rely on them to achieve the goals of legal system.For this reason,the design of methods appropriate to the requirements of those entities is an essential issue of Tenders Laws. In terms of choosing the bidding method, the bidder's goal should be based on the selection of a qualified person of the contracting party, in the best time and the most appropriate conditions to be able to the best and most appropriate bid submitted by him.Therefore all procurement rules have been devoted to a variety of bidding procedures.The present article identifies the principles that the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement has taken into account in designing the tendering procedures and compares them with the procedures outlined in Iran's Tender Law. This research intends to answer the question of what are the differences between the tendering methods in the two documents and in the current situation by comparatively examining the various methods of holding tenders in the Iran's Tender Law and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement. Which of them is more successful in achieving the goals of bidding laws? But the focus is on explaining the rules and regulations used in the UNCITRAL Code. Thus, first, the methods of holding tenders mentioned in Iranian law are briefly explained, and then the related issues stated in the sample law are examined with more care and reflection.