Arab Revolutions; The Transition from the Quadruple Revolution Theories

Since all currents of thought in different generations of revolutionary theory are only able to recognize and interpret the dimensions of those revolutions that they have sought to recognize, it does not seem reasonable to use them to theoretically justify future revolutions. Accordingly, the main structure of revolutionary theories during previous four theoretical generations is based on a set of predetermined factors and components as factors promoting the revolution, which are necessary in all revolutions, especially revolutions that occur after their presentation. Given these explanations and the title of the present article, the question can be asked, can all the dimensions of the Arab revolutions be theoretically justified and explained by the views of the four generations of the theory of revolution? The results of the studies show that in at least three areas, namely the process connection of domestic and international levels in a specific historical framework, the neutral role of the army in turning unrest into revolution and ultimately the victory of revolutions in the absence of leadership with the factors mentioned in previous theories have deep differences.  In this work, the author intends to investigate the mentioned differences based on the method of matching the factors influencing the occurrence of Arab unrest in the three mentioned areas with the factors mentioned in the four theories of the revolution.