Comparison of family typology in process and content models in families with high and low resilience

The aim of this study was to compare family typology in process and content model in families with high and low resilience. The method of the present study is descriptive survey and the statistical population of the present study includes; 6000 thousand parents of middle school students living in Shiraz in 1398. The sample size was 361 people who were selected by available methods. The instruments of the present study were process and content scales of Samani family (2008) and resilience of Sikbi family (2005). The validity of the questionnaire in the present study was calculated using the correlation coefficients of each question with the total score and showed that all questions have a significant correlation with the total score. Also, the reliability of the questionnaires in the present study using Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the family process self-report scale was 0.66, the family content self-report scale was 0.86 and for the family resilience was 0.95. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Chi-square and SPSS 23 software. Findings showed that there is a significant difference between family species and families with high and low resilience. Also, among the process and content subscales, in healthy and unhealthy families, problem content and problem coping problem have the highest average value and living space has the lowest average value. Therefore, it is suggested that due to the teachability of family process factors by educating families about these factors, a valuable step was taken to reduce family problems and naturally increase parental resilience.