Jurisdiction of the Court of Administrative Justice and General Courts in a Note to Article 10 of the Law on the Court of Administrative Justice

According to the provisions of the case, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice and the general courts are independent of each other. Article 10 of the Administrative Justice Court Law of 1992 defines the jurisdiction of the Court, but according to Note 1 of this Article, the amount of damages caused by the institutions and persons mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article after the court ruled on the violation with the general court. Is. The jurisdiction of the General Courts and the Court of Administrative Justice, based on the above-mentioned note, is one of the cases where the dispute between the General Courts and the Court of Administrative Justice is disputed, and in some cases causes delay in proceedings and confusion of interested parties. What is the jurisdiction of each of the authorities mentioned here? In this article, the author analyzes the materials related to the jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court and mentions the opinions of the branches of the Supreme Court and the Administrative Justice Court, while presenting a criterion in distinguishing the type of lawsuits filed in the Administrative Justice Court, arguing that the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court In lawsuits related to the note of Article 10, it is limited to special cases and not all lawsuits related to claiming damages from government agencies, especially damages resulting from coercive bail, are within the jurisdiction of this court and according to the general rule are within the jurisdiction of the general court. In the draft amendment to the law of the Court, the principle is the jurisdiction of public courts in dealing with claims for damages from government agencies.