Mortgages Capture the Nature of the Rights
Mortgage loan signing seizes the mortgaged property, the mortgagee after the bill is to be captured and he will be benefited. If the mortgagee, if the mortgagee is entitled to the benefits to which they seized mortgage. From the perspective of civil law, in conformity with Article 794 of the Articles 793 and 794 of such impressions that refers to the seizure of material, Only this interpretation can be collected between matter and said that the possession of material non-harmful, non-beneficial, non-authorized Have argued that Article 793 of the Civil Code or, the opposite, it is just to prohibit possession exercised contrary to the mortgagee, Without purpose, other possessions is the mortgagor.
The study took a mortgage on the Rights of the cross - sectional study was conducted and the library.
The comparative study between the resources and the rights of the country's leading religious scholars, we note that according to one of the foundations of the mortgage contract is necessary. Duct necessary to permit the necessary clinching doubt there is any place where a contract is required or permitted, based on this rule, mandate the conclusion that we need to be filed until proof of its permissibility. The necessary requirement of the rule is not needed because the ruling principle is licensed as opposed to the need to explain why.
Our results indicate that the differences between the legal system and the expiration of the lease term mortgage is Iran and Egypt.
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.