Political judgment as the tragic: By examining and analyzing the thought of Martha Nussbaum

It is difficult to judge between normative worlds that are in conflict and contest with each other, because they do not have the same vocabulary, agreed rational standards, and common moral obligations. Therefore, one cannot judge between them by resorting to traditional principles. Then political Judgment usually lead to the tragic matters that have dire consequences for politics, and the polis in general, as the center of politics. So the main question of this article is what political judgment means as a tragic thing, And basically, and in Nussbaum's thought what are the consequences for the form of bio-politics? This article rejects the possibility of resorting to previous principles in this field, emphasizing that political Judgment, like Judgment in a tragic situation, is an experience that occurs at the specific time and place of each individual. Based on Nussbaum's normative thought, this article seeks to present a kind of judgment as a tragic matter, that Its basic principle is moral luck and attention to human capabilities. Capabilities that lead to the liberation of man from a calamity to a happiness. In fact, judgment in Nussbaum's thought focuses on the political praxis to elements outside the actor, while at the same time emphasizing the impact of altercation and multifaceted cultural, political, and religious situations, Which are effective in directing fair and unjust behaviors, tragic or Happiness-orirnted, etc. in the political sphere.