Examining the approach of Fakhrazi's implicit denial in determining the examples of Imamate verses in comparison with the historical course of interpretations before Tafsir Kabir

Evaluation of the interpreter's work with his previous works, which is the foundation of the subsequent works, is one of the criteria that shows compliance with the scientific principles of interpretation, avoiding religious prejudices and the interference of external affairs, especially this issue. It is crystallized in controversial issues such as Imamate. This research with descriptive analytical method, with the mentioned purpose, has investigated the performance of Fakhrazi in Tafsir Kabir on the issue of determining the examples of Imamate verses. The findings of the research indicate that Fakhrazi has adopted four approaches in the issue of Imamate, which are explicit exclusive agreement, implicit agreement jointly with other examples, implicit opposition without specifying in denying the example, and finally, explicit opposition to the examples of the verses. And since the approach of implicit denial occupies the largest part of the verses of Imamate, but has received less attention, the focus of the present research is on this approach. The final result showed that Fakhrazi, despite being aware of the interpretations of the parties, refused to quote and express the real examples of the verses of Imamate.