The challenges of military law in the intersection with the doctrines of civil rights: with an emphasis on the duties of public officers of justice

Military law, as one of the areas of criminal law, has many differences in comparison with civil law and related doctrines, which causes a challenge between these two sensitive areas. Due to the age in the codified laws of military rights and its lack of up-to-dateness and non-compliance with the modern doctrines of civil rights, especially the Charter of Civil Rights which has benefited from the latest standards of human rights, military law does not have this characteristic and needs to be transformed and has evolved and continues to show resistance to changes in civil rights, and for this reason, those subject to military rights, especially the general officers of justice (Naja), show the greatest friction in dealing with citizens in the confrontation between the rigid and inflexible military laws. have given. In the end, it seems that military rights are in conflict with the doctrines of civil rights, but the link between these two rights can be found in the responsibilities and duties of public officers of justice. Therefore, in this path, in addition to the above, there are other obstacles and challenges, including: Not updating and not amending the existing military laws, The inflexibility of military rights in front of the new developments of citizenship rights. There is a lack of awareness and general knowledge of officers and citizens regarding the issues of citizenship rights, etc. In this research, we have tried to identify the challenges facing the evolution in the field of military criminal law by analyzing the legislative history and its adaptation to modern legal doctrines, in order to reach the components and standards of the charter of citizenship rights.