Ethical indecency and fineness

Ethical indecency and fineness have paramount importance in ethics. If it is denied, ethics will be considered relative. In this article, its definitions and aspects will be discussed using the Islamic sources. The data have been collected from reliable Islamic sources and search engines such as Yahoo, Google, and Iran Medex using key words such as “innate goodness and badness”, “ethical indecency and fineness” and “rational deductions”. The five found definitions are " compatibility and incompatibility with habitude"," aims agreement"," perfection and imperfection", “admiration and criticism” and “innate tendencies”. Human humors can be defined as brutal humor and spiritual humor. The first definition doesn’t give us a scale to differentiate ethical from unethical issues and the second one can’t prove spiritual deeds comprehensively; unless its correctness has been accepted. The aims have three types: individual aims, common aims and favorable aims. Individual aims lead to ethical chaos but common aims can support ethics. Common aims neither clarify the essence of an action nor concern innate "goodness and badness". They are really the explanations for reasonable indecency or fineness”. Favorable aims seek God's satisfaction and need good intends. Perfection and imperfection is actually another expression for “compatibility with humor”. "Admiration and criticism" is the only definition of optional conducts. It is defined as "appropriateness of admiration and criticism", " order of admiration and criticism"," having capability to be admired or criticized", "admiration and criticism by themselves "and " the wise opinions for admiration or criticism". “Innate tendencies” are another explanation for “compatibility with humor”. In defining “ethical indecency and fineness”, we should consider standards with ethical applications like compatibility with celestial humor, perfection and imperfection, innate tendencies and common aims.