The Effects of Using Reflective Action Approach on the Critical Thinking of Students and Teachers in Tabriz Teachers Education Colleges

We studied the effects of using Reflective Action Approach (RAA) on critical thinking of students and teachers. The research method was a semi-experimental and factorial design (2×2). The subjects were 93 students from Tabriz Teachers Education Colleges of which 46 students and teachers (24 female and 22 male) formed the experimental group to receive RAA and 47 students and teachers (25 female and 22 male) formed the control group who received the traditional approach. Measures were the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI). The results of MANCOVA analysis revealed that reflective action enhanced the experimental group's critical thinking skills (deduction) and disposition toward critical thinking (inquisitiveness, systematic activity, and maturity of judgment). There was no gender differences for the positive outcomes of the RAA.