The effect of lidocaine 2% compared of mepivacaine 3% on blood pressure & heart rate changes after inferior alveolar nerve block injection

Message:
Abstract:
Background And Aim

There are major issues of concern regarding of blood pressure & heart rate changes due to injection of local anesthesia and contradictory. According to different reports about exists the effect of local anesthesia agents on cardiovascular system. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of anesthetic agent: lidocaine 2% with epinephrine and mepivacaine 3% on blood pressure & heart rate changes after inferior alveolar nerve block injection.Methods and Materials: In the present randomized single blind cross over clinical trial study 35 patient (70 models) were participated. In the first visit the patients were injected with one of the aesthetics agents and on their second visit, the other aesthetic agent was injected. Patients were asked to complete the stress questionnaire and then the blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Afterwards, the injection was made and B.P and heart rate were recorded immediately after the injection and 10 minutes later. Paired T-test was used for data analysis.

Results

there was no significant difference between the effect of lidocaine and mepivacaine on blood pressure & heart rate before, right after and 10 minutes after inferior alveolar nerve block injection. Also, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of systolic and diastolic BP and pulse rate, although there was a genered increase in the group injected with lidocaine. In the present study, there was a significant positive linear correlation between the score of DAS (stress of dental) and systolic & diastolic blood pressure& heart rate changes before, right after & 10 minutes after the injection.

Conclusion

There were no major changes in systolic & diastolic blood pressure& pulse rate immediately & 10 minutes after injection in & among groups, which indicates that use of lidocaine & mepivacaine will not make any systemic difference in healthy patients. However more research is recommended for the systemically compromised patients.

Language:
Persian
Published:
Journal of Research in Dental Sciences, Volume:6 Issue: 2, 2009
Page:
51
magiran.com/p833451  
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یک‌ساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال می‌توانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
  • حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران می‌شود.
  • پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانه‌های چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمی‌دهد.
In order to view content subscription is required

Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!