A Methodological Comparative Research between Sheikh Sadogh and Sheikh Mofid Theological Theory
Abstract:
Islamic theologians did not take a specific method to prove their religious beliefs and answer to the objections. Thus, we have tried in this article to research and compare between two known Shiite theologian's theological methods and foundations those are Sheikh Sadogh from Qom School and Sheikh Mofid from Baghdad School. so, it would be clear the status of reason and narration in these theological scholar's viewpoints. The, ratio of their uses of reason and narration in religious doctrines and answering to the objections have been evulvuated and proved that Sheikh Sadogh have preferred the narration method in proving the beliefs but not mean that he has left reason at all, but he has choose the narrations those have rational argument dimensions. In the other hand Sheikh Mofid in giving a special scope to reason and having a rationalistic attitude tried to prove the religious doctrines and defend. In proving our assumption, we did not rely on the generalities and used the two scholar's written works
Language:
Persian
Published:
Comparative Theology, Volume:2 Issue: 6, 2012
Page:
77
magiran.com/p954467
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!