نشریه نظریه های اجتماعی متفکران مسلمان
سال هفتم شماره 1 (پیاپی 12، بهار و تابستان 1396)

All sociologists in some way deal with two concepts of individualism and society, or social structure and human action. Accordingly, linking the two concepts, each sociologist prefers one to the other or establishes a relationship between them. As a Muslim thinker, Ali Shariati has been influenced by Islamic teachings, and the atmosphere of Islamic culture and Shia had profound effects on his method of thinking .He neither focuses solely on individualism and human agency in his subjects, nor considers society and social structure as unique factors in this aspect .He neither focuses solely on individualism and human agency in his subjects, nor considers society and social structure as unique factors in this aspect. Instead, he assumes an interaction and believes both factors of individual and society play role in knowing subjects and issues. In this paper, in order to know Shariati's approach to the issue, we will use Morteza Motahhari's perspective to examine the Shariati's approach to the subject. For this purpose, documentary research method has been used.

Since the introduction of participatory revolution and communicative turn in theory of planning, scholars and researchers, have done tremendous effort on how to achieve better community participation in urban planning at different levels and scales. This efforts have intensified by introduction of sustainability and its integration with social participation. In this paper, first, the claim that the central issue in sustainable social development is the concept of dialogue were established using literature review. In order to develop a framework for sustainable dialogue, Rumi, as the representative of the Iranian intellectual and Michael Bakhtin as the representative of Western thought is studied. Using interpretative content analysis, true dialogue component in Rumi and Bakhtin thought in Rumi's Masnavi and Bakhtin's Dialogical Imagination is extracted. The result showed that dialogue is not only merely transferring message but also is experience of new world and experience of otherness. In addition, the result showed that dialogue is not limited to verbal material and its sustainability is depended on its continuation in soul. In other words, its raise up from dialogue to telepathy. Finally, by explaining the importance of dialogue in urban planning, sustainable dialogue process framework (moral) were presented in a nonlinear process.

The main objective of this article is to explain and ultimately limiting the power and harness it in two parts of Golestan kings advice(Nasihatalmolook)and about explaining of the character of kings and the characteristics of good governance in Saadi's perspective .
The main question is that Saadi what ways has tried to prevent the spread of tyranny and corruption supreme ruler reduce the pressure on people caught tyranny.
The survey found that Saadi as an intellectual is aware and by Utilizing the Islamic and Iranian heritage Comments unmatched in the use of a tool of power and corruption offered and especially the solution of scientific and practical useful to monitor and control power of the society managers. Saadi believes the equitable distribution of power and wealth is the only way to achieve justice and expresses the ethical advice of Religions in a simple language and defends this issue . Research ahead by using a descriptive analytical approach have a look at some of the civil and social considerations of Saadi's .

Both authenticity of individual and society suffer from some deficiencies and shortcomings. Some of them are as follow; in these approaches Human and its developments are considered without their relationships with intricate universal network. They analyzed Human developments in limited scope in the form of individual and society; and in these approaches inhumane and environmental impacts are overlooked. Reviewing and rereading the Sadraee wisdom, this article investigates four goals. First, a commitment to transcendental philosophy and existential approach can be made a distinct identity for society. Secondly, based on this approach, past, present, and future of society can be integrated and be seen as the sum of all actions. Thirdly, based on the natural development of individual and society, heavenly impacts associated with them can be acknowledged. And fourth, problems associated with the notion of accepting the authenticity of society while accepting the notion of numerous identities for plurality of individuals and so, can be explained.

The most important goal of creating a spiritual community is to provide a spiritual environment for dealing with worship and servitude and pedestrians. Divine commands. Since the realization of such an event is not an accident and therefore an attempt is made to realize it on the part of the community of people, it is enough for humanity to achieve such a purpose and purpose of insight Establishing itself on the right, rational and principled principles, and to show self-image and motion.
The spiritual community has emerged from various and various components and parameters that the observance and application of these spiritual attributes leads to human emancipation from ignorance, oppression, aggression and darkness and leads to knowledge, justice and spirituality.Which provides the happiness of mankind. Therefore, paying attention to the characteristics of a society is important, because it makes it possible to identify and define the type of worldview and the governing system.

The aim of this research Showing importance the position and approach of islamic texts And the views of sociologists relative to the structure and foundations of social changes. research questions: one: How has the theme of "tradition of change" been explained in the Quranic interpretations? Two: How is the structure of social change in Islamic texts and the words of sociologists analyzed? exploratory research and an analytical descriptive approach, With the content analysis tool, In response to the first question, studies show: The first group of commentators ,The tradition of change is "transforming society from desirable to unfavorable. "The second group of commentators, The tradition has changed the meaning of "transforming society from desirable to unfavorable and vice versa." In response to the second question four issues have been discussed .First Social change factors: According to interpretative doctrines, Divine prophets are the main cause of the movement of history. Second Social change conditions: According to the teachings of the Quran, the fundamental conditions of change are :Correct opinion, Faith with action .Third Elements of social change: Two elements People (as components of society) and time (the time needed to change),attitudes to communities must be taken into consideration .Fourth obstacles to social change :From the perspective of the teachings of the Quran and sociologists, Social changes for reasons such as :Imitation, prejudice, resignation and social indifference faces a slowdown.

Society-based thinking in every period is influenced by the conditions of the society, and it is closely correlated with social institutions and social problems. During the Ghajarid Period, various religious and political factors paved the way for the pronounced presence of Shiite ulema in the society and in the government. Among the distinguished Muslim scholars, Seyyed Jafar Darabi Kashfi was a religious jurisprudent and a theoretician who was interested in social theories dealing with the ways to rule on the basis of Islamic faith during the Ghajarid government. In his books, Tohfat-ol-Moluk and Mizan-ol-Moluk, he focuses on social theories in order to describe the society, Moreover, he focuses on individual and family affairs in order to portray an ideal society for a ruler. The present study describes how the ulema were politically influential during the Ghajarid Period, and in particular, it deals with Kashfi's social theories. Findings show that Kashfi tried to outline the individual as well as social life in the light of ethical and religious teachings in an effort to base the society on reason and justice. His ultimate goal was to create a utopia, and to this end, he focused on the relationships among individuals in the society, and he discussed in detail the relationship between the government and the society in the one hand, and the relationship between the social life and various virtues for happiness both in this world and in the Hereafter.