نشریه سلفی پژوهی
پیاپی 11 (بهار و تابستان 1399)

Ibn Taymiyyah divide the acts into two wide category: achievable by God and achievable by Humans. He classifies appealing for aid from someone other than God, as an achievable act by God, and if some do that act, he will be considered as a polytheist. We must know that this division has many problems: 1- it is not a comprehensive division. 2- The criteria is irregular 3- the criteria is close to paganism rather than faith. 4- There is no unity in context of this division. This unbalanced view will lead to polytheism and Takfir, denying the Quranic verses which attributes the supernatural acts to the prophets and saints and will decrease the position of humanity. It will hamper the human capabilities and degrade its position at the level of animals. Therefore, the Salafi ideology collected an amalgam of paganism, anti-human and polytheism.

The Muslim theologians relying on intellectual and textual reasons have proved the infallibility of the prophets. Al- Sabouni, one of the famous Sunni interpreters, in this research, it is going to consider the view of Al- Sabouni. Although he has tried to interpret some verses and depict that the Holy prophet (PBH) err, he could not succeed to provide some good reason in his book, "prophecy and the prophets". According to his theory, the infallibility is divided into two parts: from infancy to death and from prophethood to death. This theory does not seem to cover his claims for erring of the prophets. This theory has caused a kind of slander in the definition of infallibility.

The exegetical book"Taysir al Karim al Rahman", is wrote by Abdulrahman Alsadi, one of the contemporary Wahhabi scholars. This research is done by descriptive-analytical method to discover the interpretive methodology of a Wahhabi and Salafi scholar. This Wahhabi scholar insists on lexical meaning and not delving into the deep meaning and insist on superficial meaning. He proves some human attributes for God in some Quranic verses, which is against reason and Salafi basics in interpretation. Also, in "guardianship" verses, ignoring the authoritative narrations acted against his doctrine in interpretations of narrations. Abdulrahman Alsadi interpreted the jurisprudential verses according to his own denomination. Claiming that his goal in interpretation is summarization, he ignored the translation of verses, neglecting different views and did not mentioned the narrations and references. He just mentioned in some cases the reason of descending of verses. However, in case of ethical verses, he explained in detail the qur'anic stories and extracted many points from them.

One of the habits of Wahhabism is undermining the narrations showing the virtues of Ahlobait (PBH). Bearing in mind this habit, Abd al-Rahman Dameshghiyyah wrote beneath the Hadith of "praying is blocked before sending bless to the Holy prophet (PBH) and his descendants": this narration is not mentioned in the Sunni source books, claiming that some of the narrators of this hadith is unknown. While, the above-mentioned hadith is narrated in Sunni source books and the narrator's chain is well known. In this research, it is tried to respond to these doubts from Abd al-Rahman al-Dameshghiyyah, referring to the Sunni source books. It seems that the reason for these doubts is just opposing the Shia, and according to this ideology, Saleh Al-Fawzan a Salafi scholar, maintains that sending bless to the holy prophet Muhammad (PBh) must accompany with his descendants and also his companions, otherwise, it is not allowed and we cannot send bless only to his descendants, Reasoning that we must always disagree with the Shia and do not follow them.

One of the main teachings of Islam is the traditional and non-traditional acts. Almost all of the Muslims agree on the senses of this rule. However, Ibn Taymiyyah contrived the expression "abandoned tradition", believing that we must consider that as a source of Islamic legislation. According to this idea, many of the halal deeds will be forbidden. While, the expression "abandoned tradition" posing by Ibn Taymiyyah has no validity in Islam. In this essay, the cases that Ibn Taymiyyah believes is against the "abandoned tradition" by the Holy Prophet will be verified solved according to the tradition of the Holy Prophet and his companions. Some of the instances that Ibn Taymiyyah believes is against the "abandoned tradition" are as the following: supplication to the saints, grooming the tombs, funeral and birthday celebrations. In this essay and by Descriptive Analytical method.