آناهیتا بابایی
-
سابقه و هدف
ارزیابی متوالی نارسایی ارگان (SOFA) برای بررسی شدت بیماری و میزان مورتالیتی بیماران بستری دربخش مراقبتهای ویژه (ICU) استفاده می شود و نیازمند آزمایشاتی است که درمراکز با منابع محدود، غیرعملی میباشد. مطالعه حاضر مقایسه ابزار پیشنهادی محقق بر بالین بیمار Bedside SOFA (b SOFA) با SOFA در پیشبینی مورتالیتی بیماران بستری در ICU است.
مواد و روش هااین مطالعه کوهورت در60 بیمار دچار سندرم پاسخ التهابی سیستمیک (SIRS) بالای 18سال جهت مقایسه SOFA و b SOFA در بدو ورود، سپس روزانه تا زمان بستری در ICUانجام شد.
یافته هابراساس ضریب توافق Lin و Bland-Altman در روزهای اول، پانزدهم، شانزدهم، هفدهم، هجدهم و بیستم توافق خیلی خوب و روزسوم، پنجم، هفتم ،چهاردهم و نوزدهم توافق خوب و همبستگی معنیدار و در روزهای دوم، چهارم، ششم، هشتم، نهم، دهم، یازدهم، دوازدهم و سیزدهم توافق متوسط ولی در روزسیزدهم و پانزدهم ضریب همبستگی از نظر آماری مستقیم ولی معنیدار نبود (0/05>p). ارزش تشخیصی SOFA و b SOFA جهت ارزیابی پروگنوز با روش مقایسه سطح زیر منحنی (Area Under Curve:AUC) در نمودار راک (ROC Curve) تا روز هفدهم اختلاف معنیداری از نظر آماری نشان نداد (0/05>p) که بیانگر ارزش تشخیصی قابل قبول b SOFA درمقایسه با SOFA به عنوان استاندارد طلایی تعیین پروگنوز است. حساسیت و ویژگی آن ها از نظر پروگنوز در زمانهای مختلف بسیار به هم نزدیک بوده و بیانگر قدرت تشخیصی مشابه دو مقیاس می باشد.
استنتاجمطالعه بیانگردقت تشخیصی، حساسیت و اختصاصیت بالا برای پیشبینی مورتالیتی و همبستگی قوی مثبت دو ابزار است، بنابراین b SOFA بدلیل هزینه کمتر و سهولت بیشتر جایگزین مناسبی برای SOFA میباشد.
کلید واژگان: SIRS، SOFAنارسایی مولتی ارگانBackground and purposeSequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) is used to assess the severity of the disease and mortality rate in patients admitted to ICU. SOFA requires experiments that are impractical in centers with limited resources. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of bedside SOFA (b SOFA) and SOFA scores in mortality of ICU patients.
Materials and methodsThis cohort study was performed in 60 patients with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) older than 18 years of age. SOFA and b SOFA scores were recorded at admission, then daily until admission at ICU.
ResultsAccording to the Lin and Bland-Altman agreement coefficient, there was a very good agreement between SOFA and b SOFA scores at days 1, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 20. At days 3, 5, 7, 14, and 19 we observed a good agreement and significant correlation between SOFA and b SOFA scores. Findings showed a moderate agreement between SOFA and b SOFA scores at days 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, but at days 13 and 15 there was a direct relationship between the two scores (P>0.05). Area Under Curve (AUC) method in ROC Curve showed no significant difference in diagnostic value between SOFA and b SOFA scores except at day 17 (P>0.05), indicating acceptable diagnostic value of b SOFA score compared to SOFA score. The sensitivity and specificity of the tools in terms of prognosis were found to be very close at different times showing similar diagnostic values.
ConclusionThe study showed diagnostic accuracy, and high sensitivity and specificity for predicting mortality and strong positive correlation between the two tools, so b SOFA is a suitable alternative due to lower cost with greater ease.
Keywords: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, multi organ failure -
IntroductionSurgery under general anesthesia induces endocrine,immunologic and metabolic responses. During operation,insulin secretion is disturbed and glucose application decreases, catabolic hormons concentration and glucose production increase and hyperglycemia occurs. Hyperglycemia is considered as an independent risk factor for surgery related mortality and morbidity. This study is designed to compare propofol and sevoflurane in blood glucose and hemodynamic variations and post-op nausea-vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.Materials And MethodsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted on 320 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They were randomly assigned into remifentanil-propofol (n=160) and remifentanil-sevoflurane (n=160) groups. All patients received intravenous midazolam 1-2 mg, fentanyl 2-3μg/kg and general anesthesia was induced by STP 3-5mg/kg, atracurium 0.5mg/kg or cisatracurium 0.15mg/kg and anesthesia was maintained in 1st group by infusion of remifentanil (0.1-1μg/kg/min) and propofol (50-150 μg/kg/min) and in 2nd group by remifentanil (0.1-1μg/kg/min) and sevoflurane (0.8-1.8% MAC). Blood glucose values and hemodynamic variables was evaluated and recorded in certain times of anesthesia as well as post-op nausea-vomiting.ResultsBlood glucose values, mean arterial pressure and heart rates in 1st group (remifentanilpropofol) was significantly lower than 2nd group (remifentanil-sevoflurane) (p<.001).Incidence of post - op nausea-vomiting was not significantly different(p=.36)ConclusionMaintenance of anesthesia by remifentanil - propofol infusion in comparison with remifentanil-sevoflurane leads to less increase in blood glucose, and lower mean arterial pressure and heart rate values, which reveals less stress response and better hemodynamic stability of propofol; especially in patients with underlying deceases.Keywords: Glucose, hemodynamic variables, propofol, sevoflurane, laparoscopic cholecystectomy
-
Introduction
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction including Agitation and delirium commonly occurs after cardiac surgery. Ketamine as a NMDA receptor antagonist exerts neuroprotective effects by preventing excitotoxic injury and apoptosis after cerebral ischemia and suppressing systemic inflamematory response to surgery.We studied the effect of intravenous Ketamine during open-heart surgery on post-operative agitation.
Materials And MethodsIn a double blind clinical trial, 40 males at least 55 years undergoing open heart surgery were divided randomly into 2 groups: intervention group (received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine iv before sternotomy and repeated the same dose on the pomp during warming) and control group (the same volume of normal saline). After the end of surgery agitation was assessed by using SAS every 2 hours until 8th hour and then every 8 hours until 3 days.
ResultsIncidence of agitation on 2nd and 3rd days after operation was significantly lower in patients receiving ketamine compared with placebo group.
ConclusionIntravenous ketamine administration during open-heart surgery can reduce post-operative agitation by its neuroprotective effect.
Keywords: Heart surgery, Agitation, Ketamine
- در این صفحه نام مورد نظر در اسامی نویسندگان مقالات جستجو میشود. ممکن است نتایج شامل مطالب نویسندگان هم نام و حتی در رشتههای مختلف باشد.
- همه مقالات ترجمه فارسی یا انگلیسی ندارند پس ممکن است مقالاتی باشند که نام نویسنده مورد نظر شما به صورت معادل فارسی یا انگلیسی آن درج شده باشد. در صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته میتوانید همزمان نام فارسی و انگلیسی نویسنده را درج نمایید.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را با شرایط متفاوت تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مطالب نشریات مراجعه کنید.