حسن رضا خلجی

Narcissistic personality disorder includes characteristics and behaviors such as showing off, fantasizing, self-conceit, need to be admired, lack of empathy, self-deception, and lack of self-esteem. The present study tries to present the results of the examination of this disorder in Islamic teachings and its treatment methods, and to determine the degree of convergence of psychological findings with these teachings. In this regard, what is the nature, etiology and diagnostic criteria of this disorder in Islam and psychology, and finally a comparison is made between them. The research is of a descriptive-analytical type, and for this purpose, after determining the characteristics of these people based on psychological research, we searched for equivalent words in the narrations. Narcissism has been mentioned and discussed in the Infallible Imams’ (as) Hadiths with words such as arrogance, boasting, wonder, bigotry and false zeal. These traits cause behaviors such as endless fantasizing, self-praise and self-deception, lack of understanding of reality, uncriticism, lack of growth, lack of social relationships, jealousy and indebtedness, which have a lot of overlap with the self-obsessed personality from a psychological point of view, but despite this, there are differences. It exists between them, and in the hadiths of infallible Imams (as), its features and consequences are more fully and accurately explained. In the end, the main cause of narcissistic disorder, which is ignorance towards Allah the Almighty and oneself, and the treatment method of this disease are presented to show that relying on the Infallible Imams’ (as) Hadiths, we can diagnose and treat this personality disorder.

Dissection is among new medical issues whose ultimate goal is safeguarding human health through education or even dissection of a pregnant dead mother to rescue her baby. Since it is not an old problem, jurisprudents in the past did not issue an fatwa on it. The present article is an attempt to discuss the canonical decree on the subject and its related issues on the basis of Imam Khomeini’s viewpoints. In the first place, therefore, the principle of permissibility regarding the things and acts is discussed to find an outlet to dissection. It is concluded that according to authentic traditions dissection of a Muslim dead body is not allowed under normal circumstances because preserving the dignity of a Muslim dead body is obligatory. But this decree can change at the time of necessity. Also it is mandatory to pay compensation to the relatives of a diseased whose body is dissected and organs taken out.

The development and the sublimity of human societies is due to the laws governing them and the way these laws are enacted. The Islamic legislative system has made various laws and issued different commands and rules for the persons competent to undertake religious obligations (mukallaf), depending on their different physical and mental states. Therefore, in this legislative system of Islam, there is never a legal impasse or deadlock. Among the Islamic rules which play a significant role in removing the social obstacles and paving the ground for running a government efficiently are the governmental and administrative laws including the decisions or judgments made by the legal guardian in the light of codes of the Law as the exigency of time and interests demands. A governmental law can be studied in many respects. In this article, after an introduction in which the meaning of a governmental law is given, the criteria and the foundations of issuing the governmental law have been studied. The article comes to the conclusion that the observance of general laws of Islam and the objectives, careful consideration for interests and the relationship between the law and the object of the law constitute an important foundation for issuing a governmental law by a Muslim ruler.

One of the needs of medical students is to use the dissection and autopsy, and because this is a modern phenomenon, therefore there is no detailed discussion among Islamic scholars about this phenomena, so there is no definite verdict about it. So the question arises is that what is the verdict of Islam about it or what's the opinion of Islam in such a matter, what will the limitations and considerations about it! This Article try's to discuss about this matter and find answers regarding the questions about it with a brief explanation about Abahy principle which is considered as the main and basic principle about things and actions, we will also find out the clues which considered to be in contrast with Islamic decrees. Cases regarded as mutilation: there are traditions which refrain mutilation. Cases regarding payment of atonement: traditions exist which bound a person to pay atonement for disfiguring a corpse. Cases about the respect to Muslims corpse: traditions asks to respect the body of a dead Muslim. In this article we will differentiate between dissection and mutilation, there is no concrete evidence about the payment of atonement and it's not confirmed, the dissection with observance of special points will not be disrespect to corps. Thus there is no solid reason for prohibition of dissection, for more precaution we can use a corpse of pagan instead of a Muslim one. At the end we will discuss traditions regarding payment of atonement for dissection of corpses.

The article deals with influencing factors of students'' participation in campus congregation prayer. Out of 1400 students، 300 were selected as subjects of the study، and were asked to answer questionnaires، the result of which is as follows: There is a direct link between the staff participation، how to pray instruction، and students'' participation. There is a close link between the place، time and physical surrounding of performing the ritual and students'' participation. There is a direct link between the status of Imam (prayer leader) as a cleric and encouraging students to participate.

Birth plan is one of the problems which has been under discussion and argument among the jurisprudential assemblies since old times and there have been different views on its legal order.Although most jurists have not disagreed on the principle of birth plan, the different ways of its performance may have different jurisprudential injunctions and viewpoints.This article seeks to investigate the jurisprudential judgment methods to prevent the formation of fetus. For this matter, the paper begins with studying various manners, including physical, hormonic, chemical and mechanical acts as well as different views of professionals and authorities in this concern.Then the paper goes on to examine the method of deposal covered in the books of jurisprudence and tradition.Finally, the article discusses the order of lawful act(ebaha) and permission of the method accepted by most of the Islamic jurists and scholars, which results in the agreement of the legal permission, except for certain negative consequences or due to the prohibition of certain manners.

There are different views concerning the permission or non- permission of women's judgment from the viewpoint of Islam.This paper is an attempt to investigate some Quranic verses and some related traditions narrated from the infallibles as well as by the consensus proof as the relevant reasons while studying the principle of non- forgery in this concern. Then the article proceeds to come up with the conclusion that Islam has exempted women from this heavy obligation.Thus, There is no reason for the permission of women's judgment. And there is no room for disputing this issue and reasoning it through the Quranic verses or traditions. There is also no argument to accept the principle of non- forgery of the judgment position for women or even to be in doubt in this concern.

One of the major elements of realizing any trade, is the intention of its creators. This intention may appear in the form of words or deeds, and sometimes does not reveal itself. Some religious experts believe that the only criterion for discriminating the trade intention is what which is stated by the traders; whereas, some others focus on the trader's intention even if it is not revealed.In this study, it is attempted to analyze these two views and their consequences.The results showed that the only criterion for judgment in trading is the intention of the dealers even if it hasnt been revealed. But approving a trade which manifests only the words and deeds of the dealer without any intention would not be satisfactory and acceptable.