حمید نیکو

Iran and Israel can be explained in terms of a zero-sum game. This means that it has to c. A. Iran is intolerable and Israel on the other hand c. A. Iran's missile and nuclear program because of the enjoyment of power and considerable influence in the Muslim world, existential threat to its own. For this reason, in the regional and international levels against the interests of c. A. Iran has moved. In this way, it has the potential and capacities of the West, including America’s strategic interest were necessary. In this regard, pressure to stop the progress of Iran's nuclear program is the regime's security strategy.On the other hand, Iran, after long negotiations over its nuclear program controversial, it marked the historic deal with the P5 1 in Vienna. Nuclear deal, "Brjam", this promises that Iran's oil and financial sanctions in exchange for curbs on nuclear enrichment will be lost. The agreement also marks the strengthening of Iran as a regional hegemonic power comes up; it seemed that America had accepted it. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, a nuclear-armed Iran as the worst possible outcome in the current situation, he said. Similarly, the Persian Gulf Arab states felt that the agreement had been excluded. Tehran problematic area for those who know, this agreement means ignoring their demands to "cut off the head of the serpent" is. This paper examines the status of Iran's nuclear program in Israel's security doctrine.

Persian Gulf Cooperation Council was created with the aim of confronting what was called threat of Islamic Revolution. Although the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries except Iran have security concerns, such as fear of internal instability and popular uprisings, but they see Iran as the most serious external threat and this viewpoint has been intensified after the Arab world's revolutions. The perspectives of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries regarding Iran, in many cases, are the same and in some cases there are minor differences. These countries alone cannot paly a major security role. That is why the foreign security of these countries is determined in alliance with the great powers and regional countries and Saudi Arabia is the main axis of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council.After Iraq-Iran war, I. R. of Iran moved toward building and developing ballistic missile technology and nuclear program which caused Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries feel an intensified threat. They have been jointly seeking to stop I. R. of Iran nuclear program. The politics of these countries have strongly been influenced by US regional policy particularly towards Iran.This paper attempts to analyze the attitudes of Persian Gulf Cooperation Council regarding Iran's nuclear program while examining the security concerns of these countries and the council’s strategies for balance of power and follow-up in the security system of the Persian Gulf region.