حیبب الله ابوالحسن شیرازی

With the re access of Putin to power in Russia which provided a second chance for this country to avoid both from the West and the benefits of convergence with its foreign policy and regional and trans-regional equations can take advantages from other side. Approach points of divergence and independence of Russia's dispute with the West, will increase level of Russian influence in the international arena.
The main question of this paper is whether Russian foreign policy in Putin new term in office, could be continuation of past policies or that it has adopted a policy of continuity and change? With descriptive and analytical methodology can be stated that Russia's foreign policy in its approaches has changed from the past with different torsion and the country's foreign policy more oriented with Eurasia foundation but the balance was known West axis at once the foundation 'Atlantic-oriented' (West wing) and exchange-based East was Executive that it is based on theoretical foundations. Thus the hypothesis that the changes occurred due to the new international environment, adopt a pragmatic approach by Putin in Russia's new foreign policy principles fusion of past and new approaches must be considered.

Nuclear deal between Iran and the P5 + 1 in Vienna on 23 June 94 is as a historic day in the history of international relations. The success of nuclear talks between Tehran and the P5 + 1 is example of the importance and stressing on politics and international diplomacy and will be the base of stability in the region and can be described this agreement as a victory for diplomacy. After two years of negotiations, long-term agreement between Iran and the P5 + 1 on Iran's nuclear activities and of sanctions was obtained. On 20 July 2015, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2231 with a comprehensive program of joint action (Barjam). Security Council resolution allowing the transfer of certain nuclear-related equipment to Iran, change two waterfalls at Fordow and updates to Arak’s reactor. The resolution also authorized transfers of nuclear related activities for the implementation of specific obligations in the Barjam knows permitted. European Council also issued a statement which approved first legal action in the form of written procedures to begin implementation of a comprehensive program of action adopted accordingly. Views on the nuclear deal are different, West described it good and fair deal while Iran believes that this agreement has been made in response to the demands of the nation but the agreement has not recognized by Israel. So that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described the agreement as a historic mistake. Persian Gulf countries also have expressed concern that this agreement is an international cover for nuclear activities of Iran. Reactions to this agreement are different and at a time when many countries have welcomed, Israel strongly opposed this and Saudi Arabia have expressed doubts about it. Israel is at the head of the victim of this agreement, Israeli officials believe Iran has achieved great prizes with the agreement that the award of hundreds of billions of dollars and Iran with such an award can continue their hegemony in the region and the world and this is a historic mistake. This paper investigates and analyzes the content of nuclear talks between Iran and America until the Security Council's 2231 resolution.