فهرست مطالب محسن پیشاهنگ

Simulated animals do not coagulate and grow in the natural litter of the animal's uterus, but are cultured and produced in the laboratory litter. There are two types of food preparation in this way: Production of meat in the laboratory or production of animals in the laboratory culture medium. Since these two methods can play an important role in feeding the people of the world, and on the other hand, the global demand for the use of halal food, especially Islamic processed meat, is growing, examining the characteristics of halal food and its application to products, it will be doubly necessary and important.

The indicators of halal food in Shia jurisprudence and a comparison of the views of contemporary jurists in this field was investigated. Considering that this research is applied research with a glance at the fundamentals, it has comparatively used the information analysis method. The opinions of jurists in this field have been studied and compared and the information and data have been analyzed based on it.

The results of the research indicates that the initial sentence on the use of these types of meat from the jurisprudential point of view is halal and if significant harm within the Islamic jurisprudence is not supposed, they won’t be haram.

Halal food is a kind of food that is most profitable in terms of nutrition, therefore, metamorphosed animals, wild animals, insects and quadrupeds that have not been slaughtered in the Islamic way, do not have the characteristics of halal food. Colonized meat is not included in any of these cases, therefore they are listed as halal.

The "family" is considered to be the most powerful and effective center of organizing a society, and in a clear relationship, the durability and consistency of a society depends on the strength of its foundations. On the other hand, the strength of family is influenced by various factors. This research is focused on answering the question of what effect halal income has on the strength of family foundations, using a documentary method and with reference to the Holy Qur'anic verses and Ahlul-Bayt traditions. The findings of the study show that attaining a halal sustenance is one of the most fundamental divine commandments and significant recommendations of the religious leaders. According to the findings of the paper, in the light of observing the rules of the halal sustenance, if the believers follow the epistemic recommendations of the religious leaders, the family has valuable components such as increased chastity, dignity, moderation, Patience, contentment and ..., which play a key role in strengthening and preventing its degeneration.

The Muslims Souk is one of the issues that has been considered since the beginning of Islam. Today, there are problems with large-scale transactions with other countries, although there have been many practical and scientific efforts. In this research, the jurisprudential rules of the Muslims Souk and the rule of buying and selling in those souks have been studied from the jurisprudential perspective and the views of the shiite and sunni's jourists. At first, the author deals with some concepts, terms and keywords such as rule, souk and Muslims. Then he goes on to discuss the jurisprudential rules of the Muslims Souk and outlines some specific issues pertaining to the Muslims souk, including whether the food, especially beef, mutton, poultry, fish, etc. that sold in the market has been slaughtered lawfully or not? In the other words, is the food in the Muslim souk generally Halal and pure or not?

Slaughter of animals in accordance with certain principles is one of the commonalities of Islam and Judaism. According to Jewish dietary law (Kashrut), meat must be made from special animals in a special way to qualify for consuming and be Kosher. According to Islamic law, slaughter of a halal animal has special conditions that allow its consumption. The purpose of this paper is to compare the slaughter of animals in the Jewish (Kusher) and Islamic religion. This research is organized in a descriptive-comparative method using library resources.

What is known as Shi'a theological thoughts has a history and evolutions without which no comprehensive image of Shi'a theology and thought could be drawn. The concept of "free will" has also experienced evolutions in history of Imamiah theology, and Shi'a theologians have presented different interpretations of it. The present paper has studied and compared the issue in the ideas of Shaikh Mufid from Baghdad theology school and Allamah Helli from Hellah theology school, and discussed its evolution process in these two schools. In Baghdad school, Shaikh Mufid following Shaikh Saduq has interpreted free will as canonization (Tashri') and determination of boundaries by Allah, while in Hellah school, Allamah Helli has mostly presented multiple reasons for the principle of free will and action of mankind.

An old challenging issue in the history of philosophy has been the problem of pleasure and pain, and their relationship with true human happiness. Prominent moral philosophers have tried to explain their nature and their role in human happiness. Fakhr Rāzī has divided pleasures into the rational and the sensational, taking bodily pleasures to be essentially painful, removing one from perfection and true happiness. Fakhr Rāzī’s theory faces fundamental challenges, including the following: counterexamples from sensational pleasures, such pleasures being existent, rather than nonexistent, goodness of pleasures being modified by moderateness, pleasantness of repeating sensational pleasures ignoring their existential reality, that is, their agreement with the human nature.