به جمع مشترکان مگیران بپیوندید!

تنها با پرداخت 70 هزارتومان حق اشتراک سالانه به متن مقالات دسترسی داشته باشید و 100 مقاله را بدون هزینه دیگری دریافت کنید.

برای پرداخت حق اشتراک اگر عضو هستید وارد شوید در غیر این صورت حساب کاربری جدید ایجاد کنید

عضویت
مقالات رزومه:

دکتر زهرا شایان

  • Arash Farbood, Sanaz Jowkar *, Mehrdad Askarian, Omidreza Momenzadeh, Zahra Shayan, Afshin Zare
    Objectives
    Shoulder pain is a prevalent reason in orthopedic clinic patients, with rotator cuff disorders being the most common cause. The Constant-murley Score (CMS) questionnaire is a practical and reliable tool for the assessment of shoulder joint function.
    Methods
    The CMS questionnaire was translated into Persian and completed by 57 patients with persistent shoulder pain due to rotator cuff tears (case group) and 50 healthy controls. The case group refilled the questionnaire after 7-10 days without receiving any special treatment. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were measured via the test-retest method and known-groups validity with the t-test, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to estimate the agreement as a measure of test-retest reliability.
    Results
    The mean ages of the case (51.8±14.2) and control groups (52.0±10.0) were similar (P=0.94). No significant difference was found between the groups regarding co-existing clinical conditions (P=0.74). The mean CMS values of the case and control groups were 46.2 (±22.3) and 87.4 (±5.7), respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Moreover, the ICC was 0.95.
    Conclusion
    The findings indicated that the Persian version of the CMS questionnaire was reliable (ICC=0.95) and valid (P<0.001) for the assessment of shoulder pain and functional status in the Southern Iranian population with rotator cuff tear disorders. Level of evidence: V
    Keywords: CMS Questionnaire, Culture Adaptation, Shoulder Pain, Translation
  • امیر رضا وثوقی*، فرزاد فرخی، رهام برازجانی، زهرا شایان، سعید سلوکی موتاب، سید علی هاشمی
    Amirreza Vosoughi *, Farzad Farokhi, Rohamroham Borazjani, Zahra Shayan, Saeed Solooki, Seyed Ali Hashemi
    Background

    Diagnosis of associated midfoot fractures in Lisfranc injuries is important for proper treatment. We aimed to describe frequency of different types of Lisfranc injuries in surgically treated cases and to find the accuracy of non-weight bearing radiographs to determine associated midfoot fractures.

    Methods

    In a retrospective study, preoperative non-weight bearing plain radiographs and CT studies of 118 surgically treated Lisfranc injuries were evaluated by 2 orthopedic surgeons. The sensitivity and specificity of fleck sign, fractures of metatarsal bases, cuneiforms, navicular, and cuboid were calculated.

    Results

    Among 118 patients with the mean age of 35.0±15.7 years, most were male (77.1%). The most common type was Myerson type B (44.1 %) followed by D2 (40.7%). Fractures of the second metatarsal base (87 patients, 73.7%), the fleck signs (85 patients, 72.0 %), and fractures of the third metatarsal base (65 patients, 55.0 %) were the three most frequent injuries. Oppositely, fractures of the fifth metatarsal base (5 patients, 4.3%), middle cuneiform (14 patients, 12.0%), and navicular (15 patients, 12.7%) were the three least common associated midfoot fractures. Plain radiographs could not show high sensitivity to distinguish associated midfoot fractures in Lisfranc injuries with the highest for the second metatarsal base fractures (78.2%). The maximum specificity was for fractures of the first metatarsal base (100%).

    Conclusions

    Non-weight bearing radiographs of the foot cannot detect all associated midfoot fractures particularly fleck sign. Therefore, preoperative CT scan is highly recommended.

    Keywords: Fracture, Lisfranc, Midfoot, Radiograph
  • Erfan Kharazmi *, Mohammad Amin Bahrami, Shima Bordbar, Zahra Shayan, Hanie Gholampoor
    Background
    In recent decades, especially after the publication of the World Health Report in 2000, many efforts have been made to develop assessment tools and improve the performance of health systems at the global and national levels. The purpose of this study was to design a method and assess the performance of health systems in various countries in its use.
    Methods
    In this retrospective study, health systems were evaluated using the opinions of experts as well as international data. Health system experts expressed their views on appropriate indicators for evaluation. The performance of the studied health systems was ranked using multi-criteria decision-making techniques (SAW & TOPSIS). Collected data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis.
    Results
    Data related to 38 indexes in eight general areas of macroeconomics, affordability for health costs, disease control, health care financing, health and nutrition, life expectancy, health resources, and mortality rates were collected in 105 countries from 2018 to 2020. According to the findings of country ranking, the health systems of Sweden, Norway, and Japan have the best performance and Afghanistan, Nigeria and Guinea have the weakest performance in the years examined.
    Conclusion
    Health systems face major challenges around the world. Scientific evaluations show that spending more resources and costs does not necessarily enhance the performance of health systems, yet using and distributing these resources and costs in health systems could enhance the hope for better performance.
    Keywords: Health system, Performance Evaluation, Index, Decision making, Assessment
  • Zahra Shayan *, Shahram Paydar, Fatemeh Maghsoudi, Ali Taheri Akerdi, Leila Shayan
    Background

    Trauma is considered an important issue in most countries. Identification of the factors affecting the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) plays a crucial role in controlling the costs and complications of prolonged hospitalization.

    Objectives

    This study aimed to identify the factors affecting the LOS of trauma patients in the ICU using stepwise and new penalized variable selection methods in count data regression.

    Methods

    The patients’ information was evaluated in Emtiaz Hospital and Shahid Rajaee trauma center in Shiraz from March 2016 to September 2017. Count regression model was used to determine the factors affecting the LOS of patients in the ICU using penalized variable selection including, Enet, Snet, and Mnet.

    Results

    The mean age of the patients (n=382) was obtained at 36.7±16.7 years, and the majority (88.4%) of the patients were male. The mean LOS in the ICU was determined at 6.2±6.6 days. Mnet with a negative binomial distribution outperformed the other penalized variable selection methods. A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of less than 9 (IRR=1.7), blunt brain trauma (IRR=1.8), chest trauma (IRR=2.2), and oxygen saturation of less than 90 (IRR=1.2) increased the LOS of trauma patients in the ICU.

    Conclusions

    Penalized variable selection methods effectively ignore or control the existing correlations between predictors. Amongst the penalized models, Mnet provided more acceptable results with smaller Akaike information criterion and fewer predictors. According to this penalty, the most important factors affecting the length of stay were chest trauma, blunt brain trauma, GCS, and oxygen saturation rate. Most clinical studies on trauma have also shown the importance of these factors.

    Keywords: ICU, LOS, Penalized variable selection, Trauma
  • حسینعلی خلیلی، ناهید ظریف صنایعی*، مانوش مهرابی، زهرا شایان
    مقدمه

    پیشرفت های تکنولوژی نیاز به استفاده از استراتژی های جدید و فعال را در آموزش پزشکی نشان می دهد. آموزش پزشکی بایستی فعال بوده، به دانشجویان کمک نمایند تا موقعیت بالینی واقعی را به اندازه کافی درک کنند. این پژوهش با هدف مقایسه اثربخشی مداخله آموزشی تکنولوژی-محور مبتنی بر مورد با آموزش حضوری، بر دانش و رضایت مندی دانشجویان پزشکی انجام شد.

    روش ها

    این پژوهش یک مداخله آموزشی با طرح پس آزمون در سال تحصیلی 1396 تا1398 بود که بر روی 584 دانشجوی پزشکی بخش های بالینی جراحی (مغز و اعصاب و ارتوپدی) دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز انجام شد. نمونه های پژوهش به صورت در دسترس انتخاب و با شیوه متوالی وغیرتصادفی به دو گروه مداخله (آموزش تکنولوژی-محور مبتنی بر مورد) و کنترل (نمرات دانشجویان حضوری دوره گذشته) تقسیم شدند. ابزار جمع آوری داده ها آزمون پایان ترم بخش جراحی و یک پرسشنامه محقق ساخته جهت سنجش رضایت مندی از محتوای چندرسانه‎ای بود. به منظور مقایسه میانگین پس آزمون نمره دانش در گروه مداخله و کنترل از آزمون تی مستقل استفاده شد.

    نتایج

    میانگین و انحراف معیار نمره دانش بعد از مداخله در گروه مداخله (1 /3±7/13و 7/2±9/12) با گروه کنترل (7 /2±6/13و 7/2±2/13) تفاوت معناداری نداشت. همچنین 51 درصد از دانشجویان کیفیت محتوای چندرسانه‎ای را مطلوب ارزیابی کردند.

    نتیجه گیری

    نتایج نشان داد که مداخله آموزشی تکنولوژی-محور مبتنی بر مورد منجر به بهبود یادگیری دانشجویان پزشکی مشابه با آموزش حضوری می شود. با توجه به موثر بودن، راحت و کم هزینه بودن این روش، استفاده از این شیوه برای آموزش پزشکی در مقطع بالینی توصیه می شود.

    کلید واژگان: مداخله آموزشی, یادگیری تکنولوژی-محور مبتنی بر مورد, دانشجوی پزشکی, دانش, رضایت مندی
    Hosseinali Khalili, Nahid Zarifsanaiey*, Manoosh Mehrabi, Zahra Shayan
    Introduction

    Technical advances highlight the need for dynamic strategies in medical training. Active medical education helps students sufficiently understand the real clinical situation. This study endeavored to compare the effectiveness of technology-enhanced Case-based Educational Intervention with In-person training on Knowledge and Satisfaction of Medical Students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

    Methods

    This study was an educational intervention with a post-test design on 584 medical students of clinical surgery departments (neurology and orthopedics) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2017-2019. The research samples were selected by convenience sampling and divided into intervention (case-based technology-based education) and control (scores of students participating in the previous in-person course) based on the non-random Consecutive sampling method. Data collection tools included a final exam in the surgical ward and a researcher-made questionnaire to assess the satisfaction of multimedia content. An independent t-test was used to compare the mean post-test knowledge score of the research samples.

    Results

    The mean and standard deviation of knowledge score after the intervention in the intervention group (13.7±33.1 and 12.9±72.7) were not significantly different from the control group (13.62±2.7 and 13.27±2.7). Besides, 51% of students rated the quality of multimedia content as appropriate.

    Conclusion

    The results revealed that case-based technology-based educational intervention leads to improved learning of medical students similar to face-to-face training. Due to the effectiveness, convenience, and low cost of this method, the use of this method is recommended for medical education in the clinical level.

    Keywords: Educational Intervention, Technology-enhanced Case-based Learning, Medical Students, Knowledge, Satisfaction
  • علی طاهری آکردی، محمد مهدی فتاحی، شکرالله سپهرتاج، زهرا قهرمانی*، شهرام پابدار، زهرا شایان
    A .Taheri Akardi, MM. Fattahi, SH. Epehrtaj, Z. Ghahremani*, SH. Pabdar, Z. Shayan
    Background & aim

     The formation of skin scars is inevitable following surgery, trauma and burns.  Wound healing is a complex process that occurs during the competition of collagen production and collapse mechanisms. Various factors such as diabetes can interfere this process with multiple mechanisms. There are also ways to speed up the process of repair and prevent wound formation which is the use of light. The present study examines the effect of polarizing light (bioptron) on the process of wound healing and prevention of wound formation in diabetic and non-diabetic rats.

    Methods

    A total of 52 rats were studied in four groups of 13 with and without diabetes and with and without using light bioptron: First group: without diabetes, without light; group 2: without diabetes, with light; group 3: with diabetes, without light; group 4: with diabetes, with light. At first, the wound was formed about 2 cm in rats and sutured. Then grouping wound was dressed with normal saline daily in two groups with and without diabetes and the other group was exposed to bipotron light at a distance of 10 cm for 10 minutes with a power of 2.4 joule cm2. Then the scars were scanned by using the Stony Brook Scar Scale for objective measurements of the wound over a period of 21 days. In the end, the rats were sacrificed and the wounds were sent to the lab for histological examination. The incidence of wound was studied based on histological examination on necrosis parameters, fibroblastic proliferation, collagen accumulation, granulation tissue maturation, epithelialization and neovascularization.

    Results

    There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of SBSES scores on days 7, 14 and 21. There was no difference in histopathological characteristics except for non-diabetic rats that bioptron were reduced fibroblast proliferation(pvalue<0.001) and decreased neovascularization(pvalue<0.001).

    Conclusion

    Despite the lack of significant differences between groups, using of polarized light can be corrected by reducing the proliferation of fibroblasts in the wound healing and reducing neovascularization to improve the appearance of the scar and can be used as a safe method.

    Keywords: Wound healing, Cicatrix, Light, Phototherapy, Low-level light therapy
  • Mohammad Rafiei, Naser Mohammad Gholi Mezerji, Zahra Shayan*, Ghasem Mosayebi
    Background

    White blood cell (WBC) counts are commonly used for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the early stages of pain. However, the effect of certain confounders, particularly age and sex, has been less focused. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of white blood cells in the prediction of acute appendicitis using age-sex-adjusted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.  

    Methods

    In this cross sectional study, 131 patients who had undergone appendectomy were studied during 2010-2011. Patients were placed in the normal appendix and acute appendicitis groups. ROC regression was used to identify the effects of the variables of age and sex on the diagnostic accuracy of WBCs using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Statistical analysis was conducted in Stata 12 software.  

    Results

    In ROC regression method, the AUC for the variable of WBC was 0.643 (95% CI: 0.555-0.725) without adjustment for age and sex variables, 0.672 (0.584-0.751) with an age-adjusted variable, 0.698 (0.612-0.775) with a sex-adjusted variable, and 0.710 (0.624-0.786) with both age-sex adjusted variables. 

    Conclusion

    Results indicated that age-sex adjusted variables increased the diagnostic accuracy of the WBC test for predicting acute appendicitis using ROC regression method for the WBC test.

    Keywords: White blood cell counts, Acute appendicitis, Area under the ROC Curve, ROC regression
  • Naser Mohammad Gholi Mezerji, Parisa Naseri, Zohreh Omraninezhad, Zahra Shayan*
    Introduction
    Sleep disturbances are a significant public health issue and such problems are associated with a number of psychiatric disorders. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is an effective instrument frequently used to evaluate sleep style and quality.
    Objectives
    The present study aimed to assess the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Persian version of PSQI.
    Materials and Methods
    This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1115 citizens of Arak City, Iran aged 18-60 years. They were selected by stratified random sampling method from different parts of the city. The following aspects of the Persian version of PSQI were evaluated to assess its validity and reliability. To assess the validity of the content, the questionnaire was sent to a panel of 15 academic members consisting of experts in the fields of psychology and health education. The internal consistency of the PSQI questionnaire was evaluated by the Cronbach alpha coefficient and item-scale correlation. To investigate the factor structure of the PSQI, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed with a 2-factor solution and varimax rotation. The extraction of principal factors was performed after varimax orthogonal rotation and Kaiser’s criterion. At last, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was applied to assess the reliability of the PSQI questionnaire. All analyses were performed in SPSS V. 16.0 and AMOS for Windows.
    Results
    The Persian version of PSQI was evaluated in the study with regard to its internal consistency and factor structure. The result showed excellent item content validity index (≥0.78) and excellent scale content validity index (≥0.90). The result of the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.65. The factors of perceived sleep quality and sleep efficiency were extracted by means of factor analysis and these two factors explained 51.75% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis results show the model’s satisfactory fitting based on adequacy criteria goodness of fit index, goodness of fit index adjusted for degrees of freedom, root mean square error of approximation, and comparative fit index. The non-normed fit index was close to its reference value of 0.90.
    Conclusion
    In general, findings suggest that the Persian version of PSQI displayed satisfactory validity and reliability to measure the quality of sleep of Iranian people, at least citizens of Arak City, Iran.
    Keywords: Sleep, Psychometrics, Reliability, validity, Factor analysis
فهرست مطالب این نویسنده: 8 عنوان
  • دکتر زهرا شایان
    دکتر زهرا شایان
    (1391) دکتری آمار زیستی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز
نویسندگان همکار
  • دکتر محمدامین بهرامی
    دکتر محمدامین بهرامی
    دانشیار مدرسه مدیریت سلامت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز، ایران
  • دکتر مانوش مهرابی
    دکتر مانوش مهرابی

  • زهرا قهرمانی
    زهرا قهرمانی
    پژوهشگر ژورنالیسم پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز، ایران
بدانید!
  • این فهرست شامل مطالبی از ایشان است که در سایت مگیران نمایه شده و توسط نویسنده تایید شده‌است.
  • مگیران تنها مقالات مجلات ایرانی عضو خود را نمایه می‌کند. بدیهی است مقالات منتشر شده نگارنده/پژوهشگر در مجلات خارجی، همایش‌ها و مجلاتی که با مگیران همکاری ندارند در این فهرست نیامده‌است.
  • اسامی نویسندگان همکار در صورت عضویت در مگیران و تایید مقالات نمایش داده می شود.
درخواست پشتیبانی - گزارش اشکال