دکتر رحمان پاریاد

This study aimed to investigate the interdisciplinary attention to children's rights education in the curriculum of elementary school social studies have been conducted in Iran. In this study, a qualitative method to identify the components and characteristics of child rights education also content analysis to analyze the elementary school social studies curriculum has been used. The population in the content analysis was the country’s social studies curriculum in primary schools among which the country’s social studies curriculum third, fourth, fifth and sixth in the year of 2015-2016 has been selected intentionally. In order to collect information, check lists was analysis objectives analysis check list, textbook content check list, and teacher's textbooks content check list. For the analysis of the data, Shannon’s entropy method was used to obtain the credibility ratings of each component and to compare their coefficients. After the study of literature and legal framework, the proposal was developed and its validity was confirmed by a number of experts in education, law and other relevant experts. The findings showed that in the social studies curriculum of primary education in the objectives most credibility rating is related to educational rights (0.274) and less to health rights (0) and justice component (0), among The textbooks most credibility rating was related to health rights (0.205), and less to procedural law component (0.15), and amongThe teacher's textbooks most credibility rating was related to specific support (0.243) and less to procedural law component (0).

Human life and its new requirements have made the specialization of sciences a must. However, from the beginning the categories of knowledge could not make a clear boundary among different fields of sciences. Extra specialization along with the complexity of science’s issues caused the spread of assimilation attitudes in production of knowledge. In the first part of the paper, the present situation of knowledge and need of unity among sciences will be explained. In the second part, the authors briefly explain the new patterns of knowledge are discussed. The final section of paper presents a model to emphasize on necessities of unity of humanities disciplines.

The present survey intends to explain the components of knowledge and information and identify the barriers and find out ways with scientific approach and analyzes human sciences challenges in the field of practicability and function. The author in this research describes the day by day development of human being in modern era and the ego of modern man which is based on humanistic and post-humanistic beliefs. Then refers to experimental and scientific methods and ignoring the goal-oriented ideas by modern man whose opinion is limited in the framework of natural sciences. The method of the research is analyzes- descriptive study. The results of the study indicate that basic engineering sciences are at the center of concentration and vice versa the human sciences are in margin and ignorance. The authors of the article conclude that the human sciences should be the first priority in programming and policy making in universities and scientific centers. Humanities discipline helps people understand their own culture and determine their place in the world. Therefore studies in humanities should be a priority.

One of the ways to increase efficiency and effectiveness of universities is performance evaluation of its various dimensions. In the past decade, with the reduction of social demand for higher education affected by quantitative expansion of universities, educational planners have been focused on analysis and evaluation of higher education quality. Considering students’ opinions, as main customers of this system, about university lecturer's performances could be a good point of reference for understanding the conditions governing the quality of universities. The main purpose of the present study is to determine the relationship between faculty members’ social popularity with their evaluation by students at the University of Lorestan. A sample of 500 students from all colleges of University of Lorestan was selected by Stratified Random Sampling Method. Data was gathered by a researcher- made questionnaire with 30 questions and a ready questionnaire with 15 questions using a five –point Likert Scale. Content validity of the questionnaires was determined by university faculty members and their reliabilities by Cronbach's alpha. The first findings of the study confirmed that there is a positive and significant correlation between the two variables of social popularity of university lecturers and their scientific evaluation by students. Other research findings confirm that academic ability in comparison with teaching ability can vary and be explained by changes to the social popularity of faculty members. Furthermore, among different components of social popularity, relational and managerial validity have more impact on university lecturers’ popularity.