fariborz heidari

By confessing the perpetrator to commit a crime with a certain person (In adultery or sodomy) exactly another crime is posed as Qazf. On the other hand, if one does not confess to commit adultery or sodomy, Basically, the occurrence of a double crime of adultery or sodomy will remain in patent ambiguity. Hence, the validity and credibility of confessions in sexual crimes have some problems in the judicious definition that the legislator did in 2013. Therefore, the discussion of the issue of proving evidence in sexual crimes, despite the well-known jurisprudential point of view of the importance of having this evidence, is an entry to exit from this legislative crisis Also, Abu Hanifa's theory that no adultery is carried out without victim that among the Sunni jurists is also an opportunity to present different views in the analogous jurisprudence.

One of the innovations in the "Code of Criminal Procedure", which is approved in 1392, than the former criminal codes, is the topic of criminal supervision writs in the field of writs for supply. Although the provided instructions for this topic in Article 247 of the the Code of Criminal Procedure, are similar to the supplementary punishment of Article 23 of the Criminal Code, they are still notable, because they are contemplated by the prosecutor and even before the issuance of the sentence. Since the laws of the French "Code of Criminal Procedure" have always been pioneer and also effective on the developments in our "Code of Criminal Procedure", a comparative study between Iran and France, on the issue of "Writ for Judicial Supervision" and "Writ for Supervision by Electronic Equipment" regarding the concept of supervision, both in terms of maintaining and observing human dignity, judicial authority and etc. is considered as a remarkable specialized field of studyº So that while protecting the freedom and dignity of individuals, it also emphasizes the respect of the order and law of the community.

The main purpose of this study is to examine comparatively the viewpoints of Pr. Mutahhari and Dr. Shariati on social inequity. The study has been performed by a descriptive method, the data have been gathered by a library way, and they have been analyzed comparatively. The results are as follows: Pr. Mutahhari considers discrimination, abnormal habits, ignorance of the divine rules, inobservance of the laws, money-accumulating, and exploitation as the factors bring about the social inequities, while Dr. Shariati mentions private ownership, presence of the tyrants, money-accumulating, and exploitation as the factors lead to the social inequities. Both think of inequities as inevitable.To efface the social inequities, Pr. Mutahhari suggests the following resolutions: Islamic education, survival competition, observing the laws, mutual observance of the human and government rights, and taking the Islamic taxes. Dr. Shariati's resolutions to treat the social inequities include: making a nation on the basis of justice, creating social ownership and taking the Islamic taxes.