hassanali akhlaghi amiri

The derivation of a jurisprudential ruling in a certain path and mechanism sometimes faces challenges that the mujtahid must find a solution to get out of it and complete the issuance of the ruling. One of these challenges is the conflict between a narrative reason and a rational reason, the mechanism of reaching its conclusion is the problem of this research, and since it does not have a rich background, it is also an indicator of the novelty of this article compared to similar works. This research in the interdisciplinary geography of jurisprudence and principles, and in a descriptive, analytical way, the process of how to overcome the challenge of the conflict between narrative reason and rational reason has been the focus of its main question. The findings of this research show that in the conflict between narrative and rational reason, if the narrative reason is valid, in the assumption of conflict with unnecessary rational reason, the narrative reason takes precedence, and if the rational reason is one of necessity and certainties, then the rational reason takes precedence over the narrative. The Usulists of Ahl al-Sunnah have a consensus that in the conflict between qiyas and single news, if it is not possible to combine them, the reason of suspicion is preferable; But they differ on which one of these two is preferable; But from the Shiite point of view, due to the inauthenticity of "Qiyas", such a conflict does not arise.

Islam as a comprehensive and eternal Sharia is introduced in Qur’an and Hadiths of the infallibles as an easy taking religion, and several reasons prove this quality of the religion. There is no doubt that the most important parts of the religion which deal with the acts of the people are the jurisprudential laws that are elicited from the early sources by the scholars (Mujtahids) and offered to their followers in the Absence era. In the present time given the long interval between the Fatwas and emergence of the Qur’anic verses and the Hadiths and some other factors, the Islamic jurisprudence especially it’s Shi’a branch has faced difficulties at least in some cases. This difficulty in addition to showing inability of the Islamic jurisprudence to respond to the needs of the contemporary mankind contradicts with the soul of the Islamic jurisprudence that is leniency for the people. The present paper has studied some factors taking effect on the difficulty of some Fatwas of the Imamiah Jurists. The conclusions of the research can help the young clergies and those who are near to reach Ijtihad (scholarship in jurisprudence) to be committed to the soul of the Islamic jurisprudence and remove difficulties of some Fatwas.