hossein ajorlou

Foreign policy, especially in the field of action, is one of the signs and manifestations of the level of power and position of each actor in the structure of the international system, because it is generally adopted based on domestic, regional and international capabilities, capacities, restrictions and restrictions. This study seeks to answer the question of what position the new foreign policy of the United States of America defines for the country in the structure of the international system, considering the requirements and components of the foreign policy of a superpower in the structure of the international system. This article attempts to examine the position of the United States of America as a superpower in the structure of the international system by analyzing the actions and reactions, orientations, biases of the new foreign policy of this country and also using propositions and concepts derived from existing theories of international relations. And foreign policy that explains the position of actors in the hierarchy of power in the structure of the international system also,describing the requirements and components of a superpower and compare the new US foreign policy to examine its new position in the structure of the international system. Looking at US foreign policy, both in the short-term, medium-term and long-term goals, and in actions such as anti-institutional measures, reducing the power of international consensus through persuasion, reducing forward options, increasing passivity in important regional and international cases affecting The balance of power is witnessing developments that show the decline of the country's position in the structure of the international system from a systemic superpower and hegemony to the position of a major world power.

Today that Muslim world is faced with expansionism of the Zionist Regime and its international and regional allies, it is necessary to understand the thoughts of individuals who were influential in anti-Israel resistance. In this context, we study the personalities of Imam Musa Sadr, who was the leader of Lebanese Shiites and who was regarded as a student of Imam Khomeini. It is because, sharing viewpoints and conducting actions, such as forming Lebanese Resistance and attempting to form resistant community, strike blows to the Zionist regime –which brought about victory of the Lebanese resistance against Israeli expansionism. Imam Musa Sadr believed that Zionism thought is the root cause of Palestinian issueand various projects of Israel. Therefore, he presented strengthening and abiding the Resistance, preserving unity and avoiding internal conflicts, moving in line with plan and wisdom, using Islam and spirituality, forming a resistant society, entering Lebanese Shiites into the Resistance and strengthening Arab armies and calling for their cooperation, as the appropriate solutions to deal with Israel.

With the unfolding of recent developments in the Arab world and fall of political systems in some of Arab countries as well as spread of Islamic thoughts, new grounds have been created for new wave of Islamic awakening. It seems that this wave has become dynamic over the past few years. Islamic awakening is an opportunity for realization of the ideal of Palestine. The present paper is an attempt to answer the following question on the basis of SWOT strategic analysis: What are the suitable and possible strategies for the realization of Palestinian ideal in the light of Islamic awakening opportunity? Attempts have been made through strategic analysis method to analyze the strong points of the Palestinian issue such as resistance, public support, foreign support as well as its weak points such as internal differences, economic problems, lack an integrated organization and a single leadership as well as the threats it faces such as intelligent foreign policy, settlement building, measures of the security system of the Zionist regime and measures of the conservative trends in the Middle East against resistance. Taking into account the opportunities of the Islamic awakening in the aftermath of the developments in the Arab world, attempts have been made to offer some strategies to institutionalize the Islamic ideology, a strategy for organized movement and promotion of unity, which seems to be necessary for the promotion of Islamic awakening and its move towards correct direction.

Three years after a popular uprising in Egypt, it is clear, revolutionary leadership has largely failed to respond to changes, challenges and opportunities in the domestic and regional environments. While, a large number of politicians and analysts believe that the success of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the in the domestic and regional environments, are rooted in Islamic Revolution under Imam Khomeini's Transformational Leadership. The question arises that why revolutionary leadership has failed in Egypt and why has succeeded in Iran. it seems that lack of Transformational Leadership in the Egyptian Revolution was the causes of the failure of the revolution. While, Imam Khomeini's leadership in the Iran's Islamic Revolution had features such as Charisma, Vision, Emotional intelligence (EI) and willingness to changes.

Syrian geopolitics has granted a strategic status to the country in such a way that any change in the country’s political system would change the Middle Eastern geopolitics. This, in turn, would directly influence Iran’s regional policy. This article addresses the political and economic factors that caused the rise of revolutionary and protest wave as well as its regional and international repercussions. This movement is characterized with a different ideology, absence of leadership and organization, foreign coordination and armed struggle. These characteristics would make scenario-building for Syria more difficult, demanding academic caution. On this basis, a number of scenarios can be imagined as follows: survival of the existing regime, dominance of the pro-Western liberals, rise of extremists Salafis, coming to power of a new military government, rule of a conservative government in line with the regional conservative governments, continued civil war, foreign war for national unity and secession.