mehdi ghafoorizad

Today, the air transport industry is one of the most important ways of communication between countries.Despite the advantages of using airplanes,accidents are inevitable.Therefore, at the level of international law,aviation security and the identification of those responsible for accidents and incidents have become the subject of numerous conventions. In domestic law, regulations and various organizations are in charge of flight matters.On 18/10/2018, a Ukrainian plane that was leaving Tehran for Kyiv was targeted by Iranian air defenses, and the cause of this incident was stated to be human error.Considering that the nature of the accident caused the death of all 176 passengers of the plane, the basic question here is what duties and responsibilities Iran has towards the survivors and what basic steps it should take in order to fulfill its obligations.Therefore, this research has been carried out with the aim of examining the legal obligations of the Iranian government towards the survivors of Flight 752 according to Iranian laws and international laws. The main question in this research is the examination of the limits of civil and legal responsibility of the Iranian government for the aforementioned incident.The results of this research show that, from the international point of view, the conditions are ready for the realization of the government's legal responsibility, and from the point of view of domestic law, the government is responsible for compensating the damage caused to the survivors. The research method in this study is descriptive-analytical, and the library method was used to collect the sources.

The main purpose of this article is to explain one of the legal methods of maintaining the economic balance formed during the conclusion of international investment agreements in the upstream operations of oil and gas contracts from the perspective of Iranian law, which in the literature of oil and gas law entitled "Condition It is called "economic balance". During the implementation of a sample of upstream international oil and gas contracts may be political and social changes, wars, regional and international conflicts and turmoil, financial and currency fluctuations, sharp rise and fall in prices, economic crises, foreign sanctions, changes Geology and the environment, change of governments and laws and regulations. Sometimes these events lead to a fundamental change in the circumstances of the time of the contract and upset the economic balance and make it very difficult to implement and require high costs. . Therefore, the present study, using a descriptive-analytical method, seeks to answer the question that what effect can a fundamental change in the circumstances of the time of concluding the contract have on the implementation of this group of contracts? In general, in the event of a fundamental change in circumstances, three effects of dissolution, termination or adjustment may occur. Liquidation can not occur as one of these effects in upstream contracts because a fundamental change in the inherent conditions of the contract will lead to its dissolution, while the balance of exchanges or the manner of performance of the contract are not inherent

Today, administrative litigation is recognized as a new type of litigation. The importance of observing the principles and standards of fair trial in this type of trial is twofold, because in this type of trial, one side of the relationship is the government, which is in a position beyond. Anticipation of legal mechanisms to comply with the standards and criteria of ritual fairness in order to protect the rights of persons involved in the administrative proceedings, causes the proceedings to be carried out in an appropriate manner at the administrative level. Accordingly, the Law on the Establishment of Disciplinary Boards to Investigate Complaints and Violations of Armed Forces Employees provides for primary and review boards in the IRGC, the army, the police, and the Ministry of Defense to investigate violations by members of the Armed Forces. Is. The results of this study show that the general criteria of a fair trial such as two-level trial, the principle of independence and impartiality of the judicial authority, the principle of trial within a reasonable time and providing sufficient opportunity for defense and the right to a lawyer in these authorities are violated. Seriously faced. The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical and library method has been used in collecting resources.

Civil liability is one of the most important issues in all jobs. Meanwhile, the importance of this issue in the medical profession is doubled, considering that the medical profession is related to the physical and mental condition of individuals from one perspective and on the other hand is part of the medical obligations that have moral aspects and public conscience. This issue has not been neglected in the knowledge of jurisprudence, and in the principles of Shiite jurisprudence, there are two views on the responsibility of the physician with the phrase "physicianchr('39')s guarantee". But others believe that the physician is not the guarantor in this case, and that their reason is based on the principle of innocence. In this qualitative article, the descriptive-analytical method and collection of information in the form of library and documentary views on jurisprudential and legal views on the civil liability of physicians and the guarantee of disciplinary, criminal and legal enforcement of medical violations will be examined. One of the most important results of this study is that in Islam, the good faith of the physician has been discussed and the physicianchr('39')s intention is to cure the patient, and if he commits an unintentional fault, he may be morally responsible, but he is responsible for compensation. There is no damage. Because the emphasis of the Holy Quran in the words "And we are on the good side of my mustache" and "the punishment of the good of the good except the good" is a proof of the good intention and the intention of the doctor. There is a difference of opinion among jurists regarding the responsibility of the physician, and the Islamic Penal Code recognizes the basis of the physicianchr('39')s fault, although this fault can be assumed and proven otherwise.