mohammadhasan emamverdy

In lease contracts where the landlord grants the tenant the right to build construction or planting trees, article 504 of the Civil Code provides for the right to retain the accessions after the expiration of the lease, following one of the two main jurisprudential views. But it leaves unanswered the question of whether or not the tenant will have priority in re-leasing by owning the accessions. Jurisprudential and legal doctrines have also sufficed to examine the right of retention of accessions. However, the tenant’s priority in re-leasing the area can be considered as an implicit customary condition, as the judicial and administrative procedure has a serious tendency to recognize this right. Moreover, the priority in renting due to the ownership of the standing property also has a legal background.

The classification of waqf (endowment) as public and private is one of the most important typologies in this field. The heterogeneity in the nature of these two types has become the basis for issuing sets of different rules regarding them. Nonetheless, in the field of law, the identification of and the distinction between the natures of the public and private types have been addressed only briefly. In this regard, with the support of the scholarly literature on jurisprudence, a precise criterion can be developed and established for the recognition of distinction between these two categories, which can serve as a basis for the difference among the rules. If the benefactor considers definite individuals as beneficiaries and they are ascertained in the composition of the endowment, then the endowment is private. However, if the benefactor has not regarded definite and ascertained individuals as beneficiaries, and, instead, the fulfilment of material or spiritual needs of a body of indefinite and fluctuating body of persons has led the benefactor to give his/her consent to the composition of the endowment, then the endowment is of the public type. Hence, private endowment is the vesting of money or property for the use or profit of definite and ascertained individuals, while public endowment is about vesting in an uncertain and fluctuating body of persons.

In civil law, the right to border is considered like the ownership. Some provisions described it of the easement. Some lawyers have identified it as the negative easement and others the independent right. In jurisprudence, most scholars, in a kind of border, believe to the ownership and in another, have identified it the priority right. The examples of border in regulations show that the right to border is two sorts: right of ownership to border and easement to border. The first type is predicted in the wastelands. Unless the government to purchase land. In the second, positive or negative easement exists on wastelands. But the negative easement may be imposed on lands by law.

Ambiguity in legal language has been part of the unwanted but inevitable legal texts. Thus, the interpretation of these texts with the aim of removing the ambiguities or the true meaning selection, or, more correctly, is a branch of knowledge of the law. But instead of focusing solely on interpretation, can prevent ambiguities in legal texts so that the law becomes clear and it not remains room for interpretation. This hypothesis is possible and necessary and result to “edition of ambiguous”. The basis of this edition is that the ambiguity be negative phenomenon in the language of law. Necessity of removing of ambiguities for the benefits that accrue to society and individuals. However, editing of abnormal ambiguities in legal language is possible, but the amount is significant. The executive place of ambiguity edition of draft law and exist laws can be considered as a step of codification of laws. So that, the authority of codification identifies ambiguities and refers them to the legislator to eliminate of them.