shiva musavi
-
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been developed to measure the health status of Congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. This study aimed to translate KCCQ into a Persian version and assess its validity and reliability. We used a forward-backward procedure to translate the questionnaire. In a cross-sectional study, 150 CHF patients and 50 healthy subjects over 30 years old were selected to assess the reliability and construct validity of the instrument. The face and content validity were used for the questionnaire's validity. The validity was examined on a population of patients with CHF using the Persian version of the Minnesota Living Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF) health survey. Calculation of the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha was done to evaluate the questionnaire's reliability. Test-retest reliability was examined by re-administering the KCCQ after 2 weeks. Test-retest results demonstrated that the Persian version has excellent reliability (ICC for all domains was higher than 0.93, P≤0.000). Internal consistency was found by Cronbach's alpha to be 0.86 for the clinical summary and 0.87 for the overall summary, respectively. Also, the correlation between the components of KCCQ and MLHQ showed satisfactory construct validity. Good Pearson's Correlation Coefficient was seen between KCCQ and MLHF (r= -0.44, P≤0.000 for the clinical summary; r= -0.45, P≤0.000 for the overall summary). Analysing the data from 50 healthy persons and 150 patients were shown that the Persian version of KCCQ has acceptable discriminate validity for all domains except self-efficacy. The Persian version of the KCCQ had satisfactory reliability and validity for assessing health-related quality of life status for Iranian CHF patients.
Keywords: Congestive Heart Failure, Health-Related Quality Of Life, Questionnaires, Reliability, Validity, The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) -
IntroductionThe present study aimed to determine the relationship between New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and disease characteristics on the quality of life scores and the distribution of the scores at different stages of Heart Failure (HF).Materials And MethodsA total of 150 patients with HF participated in this cross-sectional study. The method of data collection was interview based on NYHA classification and using the validated Persian version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (PKCCQ).ResultsAccording to NYHA classification, 10% of patients were classified as mild HF, 16% as moderate HF, 63% as severe HF, and 11% as very severe HF. Significant differences were observed for total score and the component scores of PKCCQ among four stages of the disease (PConclusionDistribution of the quality of life scores in patients with different stages of HF showed that quality of life scores overlap in the severe and very severe stages. Classifying the disease using NYHA classification cannot distinct patients with HF according to impairments in their health status between severe and very severe stages. In addition, the degree of education is the factor that may affect the quality of life.Keywords: Quality of life, Heart failure disease, New York Heart Association classification information, Clinical HF Questionnaire, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
-
زمینه و هدفهدف از این مطالعه تعیین تاثیر متغیرهای دموگرافیک و مشخصات بیماری بر امتیاز کیفیت زندگی بیماران و نیز نحوه ی توزیع امتیازات کیفیت زندگی در مراحل مختلف بیماری انسداد مزمن ریوی (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:COPD) بود.روش بررسیمطالعه مقطعی حاضر بر روی 100 بیمارمبتلا به COPD انجام گرفت. روش گردآوری داده ها به صورت مصاحبه و ابزار مورد استفاده شامل پرسشنامه های حاوی اطلاعات دموگرافیک و نسخه فارسی اعتبارسنجی شده پرسشنامه بالینی بیماری انسداد مزمن ریوی (Clinical COPD Questionnaire: CCQ) بود.یافته هاشش درصد بیماران در مرحله خفیف، 34 درصد در مرحله متوسط، 49درصد در مرحله شدید و 11 درصد در مرحله ی خیلی شدید بیماری بودند. امتیاز کل و امتیاز حوزه های پرسشنامه کیفیت زندگی در بین بیماران در مراحل مختلف بیماری تفاوت معناداری داشت (05/0 P <). نتایج آزمون آماری نشان داد که بین سن و طول مدت بیماری با کیفیت زندگی ارتباط معنادار وجود دارد. در مقایسه ی امتیاز کلی و حوزه های CCQ بین دوگروه زن و مرد دیده شد که زنان در امتیاز کل و حوزه عملکردی CCQ در مقایسه با مردان کیفیت زندگی پایین تری داشتند(05/0 P <).نتیجه گیریبررسی توزیع امتیازات کیفیت زندگی بیماران مبتلا به COPD در مراحل مختلف بیماری نشان داد که امتیازات کیفیت زندگی در مراحل خفیف و متوسط و نیز در مراحل شدید و خیلی شدید هم پوشانی دارند ودر نتیجه طبقه بندی مراحل بیماری بر اساس یافته های اسپیرومتری قادر نیست بیماران را بر طبق وضعیت سلامت وکیفیت زندگی طبقه بندی کند. به علاوه نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که متغیرهای سن، جنس وطول مدت بیماری فاکتورهایی موثر بر کیفیت زندگی هستند.
کلید واژگان: کیفیت زندگی، بیماری انسدادی مزمن ریوی، اطلاعات دموگرافیک، پرسشنامه بالینی بیماری انسداد مزمن ریویBackground And AimThe purpose of the present study was to determine the influence of demographic variables and disease characteristics on the quality of life scores and the distribution of the scores at different stages of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).Materials And MethodsOne hundred patients with COPD participated in this cross-sectional study. Interview and the validated Persian version of the clinical COPD questionnaire (PCCQ) were used for data collection. The method of data collection for the study was interview with a demographic and validated Persian version of the clinical COPD questionnaire (PCCQ).ResultsSix percent of patients were revealed as mild COPD, 34 percent of patients as moderate COPD, 49 percent of patients as severe COPD and 11 percent of patients as very severe COPD. Significant differences were observed for total score and the component scores of the PCCQ among four stages of the disease. The age and length of the disease correlated significantly with the total PCCQ score (P<0.05). In order to compare between the CCQ total score and three domains of male and female groups, the results showed that women compared to men had lower quality of life in CCQ total score and functional areas (P<0/5).ConclusionDistribution of the quality of life scores in patients with different stages of COPD patients showed that there is an overlap quality of life scores in the mild, moderate, severe and very severe stages of COPD patients. As a result, classifying the disease using spirometry cannot distinct patients with COPD according to impairments in their health status. In adittion, the age, sex and length of the disease are the main factors that may affect the quality of life.Keywords: Quality of life, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Demographic information, Clinical COPD questionnaire
- در این صفحه نام مورد نظر در اسامی نویسندگان مقالات جستجو میشود. ممکن است نتایج شامل مطالب نویسندگان هم نام و حتی در رشتههای مختلف باشد.
- همه مقالات ترجمه فارسی یا انگلیسی ندارند پس ممکن است مقالاتی باشند که نام نویسنده مورد نظر شما به صورت معادل فارسی یا انگلیسی آن درج شده باشد. در صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته میتوانید همزمان نام فارسی و انگلیسی نویسنده را درج نمایید.
- در صورتی که میخواهید جستجو را با شرایط متفاوت تکرار کنید به صفحه جستجوی پیشرفته مطالب نشریات مراجعه کنید.