نظام گفتمانی

This article addresses to narrotologyof the anecdote the mouse belonging to frog in masnavi manavi based on theory of Greimas. The auothers try to indicate how to match the structure of the narrative with the model of Greimas. Greimas who is theorist in the field of narrationConsiders the character to be part of the text and subordinate to the action. By placing the main agent in the centre in relation to the goal he changed the role that propp had described and proposed to a new model in this research using descriptive analysis method it was determined that the narrative change of the anecdote can be adapted base on the of situation in comparison to dual confrontation and from actors point of view. There are two models of action in two separate situation and interpretation of the anecdote also were analyzed in two situation s. The plot of the story is logically coherent and resonate with gerems model

On this basis, this research is looking for mythological themes in one of the valuable collections of Iranian folk tales named Mashdi Galin Khanum's stories. In this research, after identifying mythical elements and characters among the stories, it is determined that the process of transferring myths into the folk tales of this book has changed them. Among other things some components of mythology have been removed or changed in their folk definition, or other details have been added to them and some ancient myths are reflected in the bodies of other characters. The total evolution of myths in the stories of this book, based on the pattern given by Mehrdad Bahar, has been studied under four headings: transformation, fracture, integration, and the entry of foreign elements. In the end, it is concluded that based on the evolving nature of myths, mythical characters and phenomena in folk tales are also narrated with changes to make them believable or in harmony with the new space. It is also possible to find out some neglected aspects of mythology by examining folk tales.

During the last months, side by side of COVID-19, fake news has been spread along with the outbreak of the virus, depending on its importance and fear and its effects on various fields. Rumors or fake news are social phenomena and are often condemned, especially by those who fall victim to it. All human beings are often, each in a way, sometimes not obvious, at home, at work, while sitting in a public vehicle, in times of economic and social crisis, etc., exposed to fake news, hearing rumors, gossips, and so on. The initial perception of the word is that a piece of "news" whose validity and accuracy cannot be easily verified is published and is often associated with irresponsibility and immorality. What has created the context for the globalization of production and the spread of rumors is media technology and cyberspace. Rumors, like fraud and forgery, manipulate the system of fact-finding and cause the material content of truth to be replaced by the material of false content in the semantic process. The main function of the rumor in this text is to discredit and disregard the truth (replacing a lie with a valid word). Rumors and false news are phenomena that have always been produced in societies, but these phenomena are more pronounced at times when horrific events occur. With the occurrence of COVID-19 in the world since late 2019, rumors have also intensified. Some people consider the destructive effect of rumors on the escalation of the crisis to be even more important and effective than the Corona. Countries like China immediately devised a planning system to manage the news of the corona, thus limiting the spread of conflicting news and scattered statistics, yet some other countries not only did not seem to take measures to address the information crisis, their own institutions have become a source of fake news and rumors. Rumors can be studied from different perspectives, but in this research, rumors and false news are related to Corona in terms of their linguistic nature and are observed in the context of discursive systems.

The purpose of the semiotics of discourse approach is to achieve meaning through communicating between semantic and differentiating units at the macro level. This article examines how meaning produced and received in "Wuthering Heights". Discourse systems are either action-based or state-based, respectively, which are the generators of cognitive and emotional discourse systems, respectively. In this novel, the dominant discourse system is cognitive because the action is more sensible than state. Heathcliff and Catherine (two main characters) create the dominant love state and the main revenge action. Heathcliff, the main actant, gains the necessary mental, physical and financial competences and performs the action with a predetermined program. The actant reaches the evaluation and value stage by going through the qualifying, main and glorifying test. The value presented to these two characters is not financial, but a transcendent value in the name of love. Although, there are other discourse systems in the novel; emotional discourse system, different emotional states appear in several stages of the novel and Incidental discourse system: the presence of opposing systems such as birth and death is justified with no discourse except Incidental discourse system.

Signs can be placed not only in the construction of a sentence (speech) but also in an abstract linear system, with the difference that in speech, signs are not randomly placed in the order of accompaniment, but that production is said to be affected always from the characteristics of the human subjects (mediators or operators).

The effect of mediators on the arrangement of signifiers in the process of speech and texts makes us use multiple and more complex variables in the analysis of signs and discursive systems. The sensory-perceptual mood of the sign user, affected by various phenomena and variables, affects the conditions for the production and reception of signs. These conditions make it necessary to consider different cognitive and emotional categories in analysis. These variables can be represented on the axis of tension and on the square of the discursive systems.

The question is: what is the difference between the production and reception of signs in both normal and abnormal situations (such as rumors) in terms of tension and discursive systems. The most common form of sign production and use can be found in a programmatic and logical discursive system. To the extent that we deviate from the normal situation, the ground is prepared for drawing an accident discursive system. The statement that is produced in the normal state of the signs can be considered equivalent to "news" in the conventional sense, and therefore the opposite point must be interpreted as "false" which, if prevalent, is considered a "rumor". The mechanism of overcoming the situation when "enunciation" can be considered as a rumor in the system of signification is the subject of the present study. The purpose of this article is to explain the mechanism of evolution of signs in the process of discursive evolution in which rumors are produced and transformed. The research hypothesis is that the phenomenon of rumor causes the emergence of an accidental discursive system. In this discursive system, due to the heavy reduction  in cognitive categories, the level of tension is at the highest level and the signs are very fluid. In order to examine this situation in a suitable literary text, a text called “The Power of the Rumor” was chosen. This text  has been produced and reproduced in various forms, itself as a rumor, in the context of the internet digital space. This text is like a rumor without evidence and has taken a different form in each reproduction. It seemed that this text will better show us the natural mechanism of producing and receiving a signal that carries the concept of rumor.

The results show that there is a set of factors that the process of discourse is always influenced by : the energies that affect the linguistic production of the narrator, the scope of vision, the perspective on which the linguistic production is formed, the linguistic challenges that determine the degree of tension in linguistic productions, the image that the narrator has of himself, his partner or discursive rival at all times, constantly changing individual methods or manners of speech that are formed based on cultural and social backgrounds, linguistic capabilities, temporal and spatial conditions, etc., and cognitive, emotional, aesthetic, sensory-perceptual elements. According to research findings, rumors, based on a sensory-perceptual error, in the form of an event, create an accidental discursive system. In the face of such a situation, ordinary people whose actions are more emotionally-reactive, respond in a rejectionist selective approach, but specialist subjects, whose actions are more rational, with an interactive approach, in the form of a communicative respond. There is a causal relationship between the cognitive state and the emotional stress of the actors and their actions and value systems. In this way, the ordinary people, with limited knowledge and under intensive emotional tension, draw an absolute and closed value system, but a specialized subject, with extensive recognition and under low emotional stress, illustrates democratic and open value system. According to the results of this study, accidental discursive system is at the beginning of this process and a programmatic discursive system in its precursor. Ordinary people, due to the lack of cognition and foresight, provide digital logic and strengthen the risky aspect of the system, However, the elites and specialized subjects, based on analog logic, gradually evolve the process of evolution of signs which they direct it till the final goal.According to the research’s results, rumor is a semantic defect produced by the narrator whose physical and sensory-perceptual base is defective (defect, disease) and occurs as an accident. Bringing back the discourse to its ordinary logical situation needs a rational management.

Sign - semantic is one of the new approaches in determination and analyze of lingual systems , Sign - semantic is one of the new approaches in determination and analyze of lingual systems , which can be used in interaction with other research methods as an inter - field approach in literature fields . This research aims to describe and determine the existing dialogue structure in Ghaboosnameh ’ s stories while respecting sign - semantic and compare their dialogue positions via comparing existing sign - semantics in stories .Current research includes sign - semantic analysis of 10 stories of Ghaboosnameh and express diversity and multiplicity of discourses in these stories , also show the prescriptive nature of the dominant dialogue systems and it s components in each story and dialogues conversions to each other .

The present study was dedicated to a narrative analysis on the short story of "Dash Akol", written by Sadeq Hedayat, based on Greimas discourse of state and action systems. The main aim of this study was to find story structures intended by Greimas for comparing the discourse of state and action systems according to their complication and mutual effectiveness, and to investigate the reasons of failure in moving from discourse of action system to discourse of state system, or in other words, discourse cycle in this story. In the narrative analysis of this story, based on discourse of action system, we found Dash Akol and Kaka Rostam as potential and actual action-states. One of them (Dash Akol) tried to keep a champion value object and generous character, and the other one (Kak Rostam) tried to obtain the same value object in a parallel way through creating an interactive relation of induction kind. But, from the middle of the story, a female character called Marjan, as another value object, involved Dash Akol in a love story, so it caused a delay in the actions of Dash Akol. However, in the narrative analysis of the story, based on discourse of state system, it was found how action-subject

In this expressive – analytic essay Akhavan Sales`s poem titled (Veda) has been explored and analyzed using sensational semiotics. In Akhavan`s poems a sense of bitterness and disparate emotions is prevalent. This poem is a narration of interaction between two subjects in a stressful atmosphere, the narrator has an active value, but his unintentional induced stress transforms him into an inactive subject, thus somatic body is revealed in weeping form. The emotional discourse presented in this poem indicates a simultaneous decrease in the extent of cognitive and stressful emotion and shows a state of connective discourse and due to pursuing an adverse system of discourse by the other subject right from the beginning, tension-being style dominates the context of the discourse. Moreover the cognitive, sensational and emotional elements that interfere with the main subject cause the object of silence to rise to subjectivity and subjectifying of object has a relation with inactive and projective state of the narrator. The inactive subject (narrator) being under the induced and prescribed system, accepts his lower place. The separation in front of him cannot make any change in the process of meaning, because the subject of actor determines the relation emotional and cognitive aspects of discourse have with the flowing process of meaning, and it has the ability to impact both pre-strain and post-strain direction of the discourse. Thus, the choice and power of the other side of discourse has imposed the place of lower value on the inactive subject who is the narrator.

Action in mystical texts occurs under the influence of factors that provide a suitable space for mystical expression. These factors can be the result of inductive, prescriptive, incidental processes or the offspring of tension and state systems. The origin of these factors goes back to the binary oppositions on which the human system of thought is based, and the discussion about it dates back to the time of Aristotle and has continued in the 20th century in the structuralist and semiotic studies of scholars such as Saussure, Freud, Pierce, Morris, Greimas, etc. Therefore, it is based on these oppositions that in a semantic-semiotics approach, we can study the mechanisms of meaning production in discourse systems with different sensory-perceptual, cognitive and aesthetic dimensions. In the present paper, the author examines the discourse systems of the story “Pirchangi” as an example of poetic stories of Masnavi-i Ma’navi by Jalal al-Din Muhammad Balkhi (Rumi), in order to clarify the position of action, tension, existence and state systems in it and to show the transition of the main character from the initial disorder to the organized state at the end of the story. The result of the analysis indicates the prominent role of the state system in the main leap of the story in which the character moves into a state of belief through an “epiphany”. The attractiveness of this story for repeated reading, as Rumi himself points out at the end of the story, owes to the presence of the existential subject.

Storytelling is one of the important and practical tactics employed in the Koran to convey meanings and concepts. The present article adopts discourse semio-semantics, which is considered as a new approach and which provides the possibility of systematic analysis and evaluation of texts, to make a contribution to this process of conveying Koranic meanings and terms. The story of Dhul-Qarnayn in the Koran, an important didactic story which depicts one of the important idols who played a role in humanity’s world, has the potential to be studied from a semio-semantic perspective. The Koran introduces Dhul-Qarnayn by describing his three journeys. There are sixteen verses in the eighteenth chapter (sūrat) of the Koran, i.e. “The Cave” (Al-Kahf), about his personality and actions. Therefore, the writer seeks to discover the discourse process governing this story in order to provide a plan for the process of production of and formulating meaning in the story. The findings suggest that the dominant discourse of the story, especially in his third journey which is made to build a dam, is action-based. Action function has an important role in the narrative process of the story and action atmosphere controls the process of meaning production. Activists, by gaining power during an action process, are released from meaning crisis and go from the negative status of disconnection from security to the positive status of connection to security. Moreover during this process they succeed in taking over the value object which they had lost due to an external force. Furthermore, Dhul-Qarnayn’s all three journeys are driven by his superego since they are made to the farthest places in order to create a space to take humanity to perfection. This behavior originates from his monotheistic view, which is his fundamental belief and is rooted in his essence, and conveys the ethic process to the reader.

Quran artistic literature – especially prophets` stories- as a rich speech series with meaning layers provides the capacity of semiotic analysis for Qurans` researchers. This approach studies the production, perception and function of meaning in discourse disciplines, with the aim of making Quran concepts more practical, with an updated language relying on semiotics strategies. The present study tries to make it possible and clarifies and studies the Quran with more details. In this way, by the aim of applying Quran concepts with modern languages studies, the story of Queen of Sheba believing in Allah has been explored based on semiotics findings. This unique story gathered religious aim and artistic techniques beautifully.
Present approach investigates to explain management and religious governance that have a main role in transforming a person and a society. The main problem is finding the role of emotional and cognitive presence in How Queen of Sheba believed in Allah and reached monotheism. In this way, the author tries to investigate the process of semiotic change by investigating form- content approach, analyzing the process of content change and regime in power of this story. Present study with such an objective and using descriptive method and semiotics approach analysis ( based on Tension based discourse analysis) wants to answer two main questions: - How interweaving of cognitive and emotional perspectives makes the process of discourse? – Which intelligent schema are made or dominated based on this process? The hypothesis is that cognitive and emotional reaction, bring about tensive process and intelligent schema that is dominated with amplification construction of two perspectives.
The findings of the current research showed that in studying the meaning of this story, tensive process acts as a more significant basis. The Queen intends to reconstruct the type of her presence in the new experience and the position of the court Solomon, the prophet. Mingling this emotional and cognitive presence in fluctuant and spectral reaction, causes the process of the meaning of the story which tends towards the tensive discourse. In this interaction, through a step by step operation, the discourse moves from the first meaning (following the discipline of shirk) to the second meaning (faith to Allah) and in this way, meaning change occurs. This change associates with the discourse connections and discontinuities. In these connections and discontinuities tensive process leads to the formation of three intelligent schemas; amongst them, intelligent process schema is dominated with constant amplification construction in two perspectives of density and spectrum.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the short story of "Leili lullaby" of Baniameri by semio-semantic of discourse system. The main purpose is to address Shushi discourse systems in the perceptual, emotional and aesthetics dimensions and also answer the question that to what extent Iranian short stories are analyzable with this theory? It should be noted that the article first has been done by taking notes from the discourses of the story by the method of content analysis. According to semiotic, semantic is a discourse process in which producing meaning links with phenomenology. In semio-semantic, each semiotic is in interaction, challenge, contrast, alignment and shift with other semiotic which leads to a process action and the action is a way for producing meaning. Therefore, making meaning is supervised by discourse's system. The results show that how 'six sense's give the story phenomenology dimension and reach to pre-stressing and making present of the absent by creating an impulse in the main character of the story and how its emotional and aesthetics processes are formed.

Semiology-semantics criticism is an instrument for the perception of meaning.In semiology-semantics, contrary to structural semiology, signs have the opportunity to take on new signs.By creating coherent discourse systems, Gremies paved the way for interpreting the narrations, realizing that there is a drawback in the meaning in the initial narration, which needs to develop into a transcendental sense in a secondary stage at the end of the story.The story of Sheikh San’an is one of the narratives that suffers from the drawback of a chaotic state related to Sheikh San’an at the beginning of the story in which, in view of his dream, he takes an inevitable action which leads to the representation of some discourse systems.In the present research, using content analysis, we made an attempt to clarify that Attar Neishaburi has the intension to alter the undesirable initial state into a favourable one at the end of the narration by a pre-set plan.In analysing discourse systems, the first intelligent discourse system is prevailing. This means that the narrator, using systematic speech acts, depicts the evolution of meaning following an intelligent discourse.Two types of tension-emotional and providence- are created through the story, which assume the second and third status, respectively.

In «narrative semantics» theory of Greimas، the meaning is understood through discursive text segmentation. In this semantics process، the action and state as important conversation factors could form the main discourse and change the status to another form and after change modes. The action makes the intelligent discourse systems and the state makes emotional discourse systems. The sustainability in the story of “Habl-on Kal-Warid” can be studied from a new semantic perspective. In this discourse، Abu-Hani، the main story character، wants to change his spiritual status; this change occurs unconsciously at particular time and place by the young fighters. Feelings and perceptions، particularly auditioning، form this state process. On the other hand، sometimes، the action creates the story state، and the state creates the action. Intelligent and perceptional discourse systems interact with each other in “Habl-on Kal-Warid” tale and make different kinds of semantics; however، the main discourse is sentimental. Thematically، dominant discourse is ethics because of the tale''s sustainability، morality and value. The aim of this paper is to study the semantic process and the narrative traits of “Habl-on Kal-Warid” story to achieve its main meaning functions and details.

This paper studies the conditions of production and understanding of the meaning of “Leqa-on Fi LazateRahil” by Nasrin Edris, Lebanese author. The story of “Leqa..” can be studied sustainability from a new semantic point of view, which includes the photographer and the fighters’ active discourses. Hamzah follows the program; his skill in the photography creates the main character in the action. The Commander has an important role in the acquisition of Hamzah’s emotional ability. In the second discourse, the fighters enter into action after the contract and obtaining the ability. Therefore, the main actions are performed simultaneously; the fighters fight and Hamzah takes photos. All procedures are performed respectively. The dominant discourse is intelligent, but emotional processes, especially photographer part, play an important role in the story forming.The aim of this research was to study the semantic process and narrative traits of the “Leqa..” story in order to achieve the main meaning functions and details. Also the effect of emotion on the meaning process has been investigated

The semiotics is one of the scientific instruments for analyzing the discourse system, which studies the components of meaning structure and creation in texts. In semiotics, the gnosilogical characteristics of literary works will find the chance to appear clearly by surpassing mere constructive semiotics to phenomenology semiotics and showing the signs path of moving towards higher and more perfect signs. The beautiful poems of “Oghab” by Khanlari and “Arash Kamangir” by Kasrayie are the narrative oriented kind of poetry, which have the narrative characteristics due to having situational identity and various actions and nourishing precious mythos actions at the end of the story. Therefore, these two masterpieces are worth being studied and analyzed for semiotics analysis and discourse system. The prescriptive discourse system and manipulative ones are flowing at the beginning and in the middle of these two stories. Later on, proceeding the discourses and appearance of the narratives, two value systems are shaped, which through their conflicts, the dynamic semiotics discourse is provided, leading to tensional system, which is analyzable based on the expansion and pressure values. This research studies these texts by means of Greimas comparative approaches, passing through semantic square to tensional square while analyzing the type of discourse systems including prescriptive, manipulative and incidental ones in these two poems. This research Further tries to find out up to which point Persian narrative poetry is cable of analyzing the discourse systems ruling over it.