اقتصاد بازار

International political economy is a term that combines the major disciplines of the humanities, including politics, economics, sociology, anthropology, philosophy, and comparative politics. The basic element of this dynamic and inherent knowledge is that it proceeds in a two-way interaction. Schools and theories are derived from these characteristics. In this article, we have tried to deal with the evolution of international political economy from the beginning of the twentieth century to the present and its impact on human society.

After the Islamic Revolution, some intellectual and political currents discussed the concept of development. In the wake of continuing discussion on development, liberal development discourse arose from the intellectual and political currents of the 70th. In this article, we want to show how the concept of development appeared, why it was rejected by some groups, and what happened to its meaning.
Design/Methodology/Approach: In this regard, we can pay attention to the works of Mahmud Sariolghalam & Mouse Ghaninejad for a deeper understanding of the intellectual and political content of liberalism in Iran. Development discourse tries to articulate main concepts such as small government, freedom, market economy, and human rights. This study tries to examine the development discourse by using discourse analysis.
Findings: The mail question of this article is this: What is change from the perspective of liberal development discourse? In response to this question, it can be said: the change consist of the process of modernization and transition from traditional society to modern society. This means “liberal modernization”. The main element of liberal current is the optimization of liberal system, economic competition and a minimum role of state in domestic politics and international trade. The supporters of liberal current pay attention to change and modernization, and hold an optimistic view of new western civilization. They believe that in failure to reach development, determinant factors are domestic factors such as wrong thoughts and beliefs of Iranian culture.
Originality/Value: In this article, we investigate liberal development discourse and try to establish a relationship between liberal current and development. This current defends a systematic liberal perspective and a competitive economy. The Adherents of this current believe that the state intervention in economic activities must become very minimal.

Although the macro-economic policies of the country have changed from time to time in the Iranian contemporary history، still the nature and structure of state economy and the integration of the major parts of Iranian economy into the core of state capitalism and its semi-state satellites have been maintained. Therefore، the Iranian economy has experienced an identical process due to the lack of transition from state and semi-state capitalism to a logical and balanced synthesis of the functions of state and market in the economy. The primary concern and central objective of this article are to investigate the political-economic nature and causes of the non-development of privatization and to understand the continuous historical process during which the core of state capitalism has been acutely developed and reproduced in the contemporary history of Iran. In contrast، it endeavours to demonstrate، the private sector of Iranian economy has only enjoyed limited chances of and conditions for generating [property] ownership، capital accumulation، and economic growth، as well as for playing a key role in the power structure of political economy and development process in Iran. The article critiques the reductionist nature of the existing literature on the subject، and shows، by using a new theoretical approach called the “paradigm of power،” that it is not possible to understand the nature and internal logic of the tendency of the dominant elite in Islamic Republic paradigm of power towards the development of state capitalism and non-development of private sector in economy without taking into account the historical process of the formation، evolution، and establishment of this paradigm of power in society and particularly without considering their preferred nature of order in the areas of capital accumulation، hegemony، identity and legitimacy (as metonymic causations or the central and hard core of these paradigm of power).

During many years after Second World War, Keynos and welfare economy dominated Europe and many other countries. Transpiring the depression in 1970's and welfare government failure, market economy was observed by west politicians and voters.Hayek was one of the few intellectuals who theoretically and practically opposed the welfare and Keynes government by raising the economical spontaneous order and market economy. Using mannered theory and rational selection and through political idea approachh, this essay is going to prore this aim that hayk's economical spontaneous order is one of the siginificant and impressim ageuts, close to the political ideologies including right and left, at the end of the twenty century. fragmentation of East Bloc, appearance of new social movements and generalizing the global financial markets also have atlevest a unique, role in decreasing the differences of right and left ideologies and accepting the market economy.